seeker

Donating Member
  • Content Count

    5,886
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    140

seeker last won the day on February 16

seeker had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

930 Excellent

2 Followers

About seeker

  • Rank
    This Guy says:

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Somewhere; (only the shadow knows)

Recent Profile Visitors

4,882 profile views
  1. There's the post I was waiting for. I don't fly the 737, never have, and I've been waiting for a succinct summation of the issue. Thank you.
  2. OK, sorry, my mistake. I was responding to the news report which calls the thing a simulator. My point was that it's not a certified FFS. I am aware of FTDs and realize that they are also certified. You're correct, the pilot's actions and description in the video are accurate but we could sit in front of a couple of flight deck posters and point at the switches with the same accuracy - proves nothing and reveals nothing about what happened.
  3. Well, clearly it's not a certified device - there's only one pilot seat, one PFD, one CC. Sure, he demonstrates turning off some switches but without a shaker, bad airspeed data, a moving trim wheel and inputs from a bad MCAS its pointless. Did you watch Sully (the movie)? Remember the part where the test pilots showed how he could have and should have landed in Teterboro?
  4. That little "simulator" re-enactment shown is completely useless. It's not a simulator at all. It's some homemade toy. Not certified. If you look closely you can see that the trim wheel is not even functional. Whoever that guy is he's doing a great disservice to us all spewing misleading nonsense.
  5. Even more worrying is that the system resets after every pilot intervention which allows for multiple 2.5 degree inputs from the MCAS.
  6. Here's another good JBP video. Somewhat mis-titled though, should be more like "JBP discusses attitudes toward immigration." Video is 15 minutes long and appears to be off-topic as the first bit is laying groundwork for some later conclusions/statements about political attitudes toward immigration.
  7. Yeah, it's been discussed ad nauseam - no need to go through it all again.
  8. Glad I wasn't working.
  9. Well, obviously the passengers and crews are using a different yardstick - the passengers are primarily concerned with amenities; ease of parking, shopping, restaurants, plugins for their phones while crews are concerned with gate power and air-conditioning that works, runway clearing and nav aids. The passengers concerns for amenities are not trivial and I would never advocate for a reduction in comfort but you cannot sacrifice the primary purpose of the airport to meet them.
  10. Yeah, wish I'd read moeman's post before clicking the link. Please use some discretion before posting things that are likely to cause emotional damage to the rest of us.
  11. I have one in the desk drawer, ready to go if needed!
  12. Sorry, gotta disagree - Saskatchewan is right about almost everything!
  13. Trudeau is no different from most people - they wear, and project, a veneer that aligns themselves with what they perceive to be the prevailing socially accepted attitudes while deep down they are actually mysoginist, mysandrist, racist, homophobe or whatever. The problem with Trudeau is that he holds a position of great power and therefore his biases have greater effect.
  14. If any pilot actually took a minute to think about how much trust they place in others to do their job properly there'd be no airplanes flying anywhere, ever. I have also lost several friends to the failure of others to do their job correctly - skilled and conscientious pilots gone through no fault of their own. Well, I guess it's not just aviation; we trust the other cars on the highway to not cross the centerline, we trust the doctor to prescribe the correct dose and we trust the AME to latch the oil-filler cap.