Donating Member
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Jaydee last won the day on July 14

Jaydee had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

690 Excellent

About Jaydee

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

3,530 profile views
  1. Jaydee

    Trump 2.0 Continues

    The scary far left...Will those with Trump Derangement Syndrome and their hate filled agenda eventually win the war on society? Or will common sense prevail?
  2. Jaydee

    Our Prime Minister

    From a Canadian Veteran.... " It makes me laugh and disgusted at the same time to think that all of these folks that claim we have to be careful not to violate these terrorist's human rights give no thought to the human rights of all of those brutally murdered in the name of a cult of death. Oh well a Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian. Just ask any Liberal or progressive and they will tell you because its 2017. Cannon fodder and fools hoping that the alligator will eat them last. "
  3. Rex Murphy: Justin Trudeau and the climate alarmists are the fear mongers Environmentalists of the most desperate kind do not play the fear 'card.' Their whole deck is fear. They savour catastrophe as a kitten laps milk. 'We’re Doomed' is their prom theme A recent column in The New York Times may be the silliest production of the human mind since the first spark of consciousness, or the latest episode of The View. Unsurprisingly, of course, and inevitably, it’s by a global warmer. As a piece of scare-pessimism, “Raising My Child in a Doomed World” is quite unsurpassable. It was emoted/written by a John Scranton, author of a book on the same theme: We’re Doomed. Now What? Essays on War and Climate Change. He is a professor of English literature, although I think it fair to claim that neither English nor literature should be thought complicit in Mr. Scranton’s fifteen-alarm brand of climate lugubriousness and pitiless despair. Prof. Scranton is not a cheerful boyo. No one will don the party hat after reading his explanation that one logical conclusion is “… the only truly moral response to global climate change is to commit suicide. There is simply no more effective way to shrink your carbon footprint. Once you’re dead, you won’t use any more electricity, you won’t eat any more meat, you won’t burn any more gasoline, and you certainly won’t have any more children. If you really want to save the planet, you should die.” Well, break out the marshmallows, throw another log on the fire, and tune up the ukulele — we’re going to have a sing-song. A little math: within the set of All Campers, there is a subset of Happy Campers, among which Mr. Scranton is not to be located. Does he exude manic hopelessness and possess an imagination mesmerized by the thrill of apocalypticism? Does the Pope like bears he encounters in the woods? Try this passage: “Barring a miracle, the next 20 years are going to see increasingly chaotic systemic transformation in global climate patterns, unpredictable biological adaptation and a wild spectrum of human political and economic responses, including scapegoating and war. After that, things will get worse.” (Emphasis mine.) I cite these samples not to stir a Gadarene impulse among the Canadian population, nor indeed to stir the worthy subscribers of the peerless National Post, as they say on the web, to Read it All. That way madness lies. I merely wish to point out the brilliantly obvious point, which Mr. Scranton so indefatigably illustrates, that the strongest undercurrent in the great global-warming crusade is, and has always been, outrageous, hyperbolic and unhinged doom-saturated scare mongering of the millenarian kind. The most rabid in the eco fringe are fear merchants, different only in the formulation of the message from those lonely loonies in wild robes who used to station themselves outside baseball parks holding scraggly posters screaming “the end is near.” (c.f. An Inconvenient Truth.) Environmentalists of the most desperate kind do not play the fear “card.” Their whole deck is fear. They savour catastrophe as a kitten laps milk. “We’re Doomed” is their prom theme. Of all the world’s political movements there is none so invested in the art of raising scares and projecting calamity — unless its doom prophets are heeded — as environmentalism. This scenario has advantages … for them. It allows for the grand assumption of the role of messiah, flattering for those who assume it —something else for the sane people looking on. And it supplies thereby an endless stream of immaculate self-righteousness, with the attendant arrogance of wanding away any counter-views. I am the Saviour. You are the Denier (or Satan). Now Mr. Scranton’s article to which I have alluded is such a pure syrup of perfect alarmism and global-warming fear projection that I should not be surprised to see it tweeted by our current minister of the environment and climate change with the tag #MustRead. Some will dare call it “science.” It is perfectly in accord with our minister’s blithe dismissals of all who think and see differently from her. These are considerations to keep in mind when you read of Justin Trudeau’s latest bath in stagnant waters of rhetorical cliché. He’s gone for the weary “politics of fear” meme, so stale even the moths have stopped chewing on it. Lately, in the face of growing anger over his leadership, he’s taken to accusing “conservatives across the country (of) playing the fear card.” Nor does he limit it to local conservatives: he sees this as a global phenomenon: “I think one of the things that we’ve seen… they are playing not just here in Canada, but around the world a very dangerous game around the politics of fear, the politics of division … raising the kinds of anxieties…” etc. etc. A few months back, Radio-Canada reported on Mr. Trudeau’s speech to France’s National Assembly: “With his trademark rhetorical flair (!) Trudeau began his address by talking about the fear and anxiety gripping working people around the globe, pushing the disenfranchised further into the hands of populist and xenophobic movements that threaten Western liberal democratic values.” Now, this is not a Cranton-esque level of doom projection, but there are at least two points about Mr. Trudeau’s recent fascination with levelling scare-mongering charges against his opponents. Maybe three. I’ll let the capital-c Conservatives speak for themselves. Yet I am willing to go on the record as noting that their leader Andrew Scheer is less “scary” than a Care Bear, and as far his as playing the “fear card” and “raising anxieties” he’s a total flop. Not one pulse has raced since he claimed the leadership. Secondly, who’s scare mongering here? Why, the politician who is claiming that “liberal democracy” is under “threat” from his opponents. Thirdly, and this is by far the most consequential: Mr. Trudeau is the foremost political leader in the world fully subscribed to the global-warming theory that all things are coming to an end — now! A movement that pulses with fear mongering, dances with dystopia, is fascinated by extinction and apocalypse, and elevates within its ranks such superb dark, witless visionaries as the author of We’re Doomed. Now What? Who’s playing the fear card? https://nationalpost.com/opinion/rex-murphy-justin-trudeau-and-the-climate-alarmists-are-the-fear-mongers
  4. But let’s ban plastic straws in North America so it looks good but means nothing ! As with ALL pollution the mid to Far East are the problem areas but let’s Tax Canadians just in case. Shocking report reveals that 95% of plastic polluting the world's oceans comes from just TEN rivers including the Ganges and Niger THE 10 MOST POLLUTING RIVERS Yangtze East China Sea Asia Indus Arabian Sea Asia Yellow River Yellow Sea Asia Hai He Yellow Sea Asia Nile Mediterranean Africa Ganges Bay of Bengal Asia Pearl River South China Sea Asia Amur Sea of Okhotsk Asia Niger Gulf of Guinea Africa Mekong South China Sea Asia http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4970214/95-plastic-oceans-comes-just-TEN-rivers.html
  5. Jaydee

    Reality 2018

    'THEYBIES:' New Trend Has Parents Raising 'Gender-Neutral' Kids According to NBC News, there's a new trend in Millennial parenting: raising "they-bies," or children who aren't identified with either gender until they are old enough to "choose" their gender for themselves. The idea is to shield children from "harmful" "gender stereotypes" that hardwire them to be either super-feminine or toxically male. They-bies are encouraged to dress how they feel, play with gender-neutral toys, and ask to be referred to with gender-neutral pronouns like, "they," "them," "their," and "it." It's still pretty rare, NBC News claims; only around 220 families — mostly upper-class, white, and progressive — are so committed to raising their children "gender neutral" that they've joined a Facebook support group. But the ones who are committed are really committed. Is Zyler a boy or a girl? How about Kadyn? That’s a question their parents, Nate and Julia Sharpe, say only the twins can decide. The Cambridge, Mass., couple represent a small group of parents raising 'theybies' — children being brought up without gender designation from birth," NBC News reports. The answer is clear: Zyler and Kadyn, who are twins, each have a biological gender, but that gender is kept secret from friends and relatives, and even from the kids themselves (though potty training seems like it might require an in-depth conversation). The theory is that the less they-bies know about their gender, the less likely they are to be "pigeon-holed" into a gender binary. Not everyone thinks raising they-bies is a good idea, after all, much of the world isn't woke enough to lack "gendering," and raising a gender-neutral child could set that child on a path to confusion and bullying. “Once your child meets the outer world, which may be day care, or preschool, or grandparents — it's pretty much impossible to maintain a gender-free state,” one professor told NBC. “And depending on how conventional your community is, you could be setting your child up for bullying or exclusion.” The they-bies' parents NBC spoke to say they're okay with that, because they'd prefer their child to be bullied than to be a bully, and they believe forcing a child into a gender is much more "coercive" than name-calling. Gender-neutral parenting might be useful for teaching acceptance and counteracting gender dysphoria in transgender individuals, some scholars say, or to erase unconscious gendering that might come with typical parenting (like teaching girls emotions earlier, and teaching boys numbers faster). But most gender-neutral children end up identifying with one gender or the other, since while gender differences are almost completely absent at birth, they become ever more evident as a child grows. Only .06% of the world's population is authentically transgender, and woke parents who might want a more "progressive" bona fide — having a trans-gender or gender-neutral child — won't get it simply by raising a child without gender roles. https://www.dailywire.com/news/33313/theybies-new-trend-has-parents-raising-gender-emily-zanotti
  6. Jaydee

    Reality 2018

    Sick...as in whatever that excuse for a human being is needs HELP!!
  7. If the Police had totally wiped out the front line day one, I guarantee there would never be another Indiginous crisis.
  8. Jaydee

    Reality 2018

    Liberalism at its finest !!
  9. Trudeau’s Carbon tax looks pretty much dead! When Canada’s provincial premiers gather Thursday in St. Andrews, N.B. to discuss provincial priorities, it will mark Doug Ford’s first such meeting as the premier of Ontario. And one thing that’s likely to be on the agenda will be Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s plan to mandate a carbon tax in all provinces. As it happens, Premier Ford has already begun making good on his election promise to “scrap” Ontario’s cap-and-trade carbon tax and is vowing to fight any form of a federally imposed carbon tax in the province. He won’t be alone. How quickly things have changed. It seems hard to believe now, but just over a year ago, nine provinces agreed to Trudeau’s plan to usurp provincial jurisdiction and mandate a national carbon tax. At the time, only Saskatchewan opposed the Trudeau carbon-tax grab. Saskatchewan has since filed a reference case to its provincial court of appeal challenging a federally imposed carbon tax on constitutional grounds, arguing that the matter falls under provincial jurisdiction. This week, going into the meeting of the premiers, the number of provinces supporting the Trudeau carbon tax looks like it’s down to five — or maybe even four. Soon it could be down to three. Along with Saskatchewan and Doug Ford’s Ontario, Prince Edward Island has now said it will not accept Trudeau’s mandatory carbon tax. P.E.I.’s environment minister announced this month that his province “doesn’t require a tax to meet our targets” and so his government will instead be “fighting for Islanders” against one. That’s right: a Liberal provincial government, under P.E.I. Premier Wade MacLauchlan, is now siding with conservative premiers in Ontario and Saskatchewan in fighting Trudeau’s federally imposed carbon tax. https://business.financialpost.com/opinion/opinion-trudeaus-carbon-tax-looks-pretty-much-dead-now-that-most-provinces-are-out
  10. Since Trudeau started burning Canada to the core !
  11. Jaydee

    Reality 2018

    I miss the days when people dressed up to go on a flight. Welcome to 2018 !
  12. No Carbon Taxes Now, No Carbon Taxes Ever!” While the Trudeau Liberals keep ripping money out of the pockets of taxpayers and devastating Canada’s ability to compete economically, the Ford government is making it clear that they will stand up for taxpayers. https://www.spencerfernando.com/2018/07/17/watch-ontario-environment-minister-says-no-carbon-taxes-now-no-carbon-taxes-ever/