seeker

Donating Member
  • Content Count

    6,208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    168

seeker last won the day on April 5

seeker had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,092 Excellent

2 Followers

About seeker

  • Rank
    This Guy says:

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Somewhere; (only the shadow knows)

Recent Profile Visitors

5,708 profile views
  1. Yeah, that was me - you're welcome.
  2. When "social distancing" becomes a problem - watch full screen. IMG_1349.MOV
  3. Don't expect it to last. Those so inclined can, and will, rationalize anything. Once the immediate crisis is passed you'll hear, "Now is the time for us to open the borders to show the world that "we" haven't changed as a result of CV19." "Now is the time to spend more money in far-away places to "prevent" it from happening again." And, most likely, "Now is the time to double down on green-deal, climate change initiatives since we see that we don't have to live the lifestyle we lived in the past." I know the arguments are specious but predict the attempt will be to move all the lines further than they were before using whatever justification necessary.
  4. Just watching CBC news on the tube - apparently some teenagers at a house party in Mississauga/Brampton were given a $100,000 ticket for violating the Health Order. That's not a misprint - one hundred thousand dollars!
  5. It's certainly true that having the PM appear daily to announce free money for people will go a long ways to endearing him. Not many will understand that his hand is in their pockets to get the money though.
  6. Jeeez, what's up with all the phone alerts - totally ruined my day in the park telling me I should be isolating! I'm kidding, obviously, but today I got something like 6 alerts. Is there anybody that hasn't got the news yet? And if they are still out and about will another phone alert convince them to go home?
  7. Yup, fair enough. And, of course, it's impossible to measure the ultimate benefit "we" might receive from a faster recovery. Anyway, just joking - not meant as an actual critical analysis.
  8. Yeah, just making a point about our progressive tax system and the fact that the "costs" of this will be disproportionally carried by the higher tax bracket earners. It's just meant as a facetious comment so let's not derail the thread with that discussion here.
  9. Yeah, good one! The only problem is that when the CV19 issue is finally resolved we will have to address the economy and it will be a huge issue. Personally I'm concerned, for purely selfish reasons, that the government is giving vast amounts of money to everyone but I'm one of the few who actually pays taxes - that does not bode well for me.
  10. My sentiment on this changes daily (hourly). On the one hand, think about all the money people aren't, or possibly won't be, spending by staying home; recreation programs for the kids (summer camps, soccer league, hockey league), dining out, sporting events, daily driving and commuting expenses, consumer purchases, new cars. The retail and entertainment industries, along with travel and tourism, will be decimated but I think for a lot of people who aren't employed in those industries it will be close to a wash between reductions in earnings and reductions in expenses. Yes, I know there will be a huge number of unemployed and, as an airline employee, I will take a significant pay cut but, being a prudent person, I have gone through my budget and have been able to greatly reduce the outgoing. This, along with tightly controlled discretionary spending could see my financial situation being about the same as previously up to maybe a 6-8 month timeframe and that's with no recovery at all. IDK, maybe I'm just fooling myself but I do forsee a huge pent-up demand for travel. The reasons why people travel will not have disappeared and after months of quarantine and lockdown could see travel of one of the things people choose to spend their discretionary money on first. On the other hand, maybe it's the beginning of the next great depression and it takes a decade to recover with massive mortgage defaults, soup lines and tumbleweeds in the streets.
  11. Your example is disengenuous. The example you should be using is someone who buys a GMC pickup at a 30% discount to the standard price but the contract is "non-refundable". Most airlines, as far as I know, do sell fully refundable tickets - they just cost more. It's up to the consumer to decide how confident they are in all factors aligning for the trip to happen. I get it. It's human nature to try to save money and buy the cheapest fare but a "fully refundable" ticket has value as we see now. Even if there was a big red flashing button and a siren demanding an acknowledgement that the ticket about to be purchased was non-refundable people would still buy it and then complain bitterly on twitter if the trip didn't happen and they were given a voucher instead of a refund.
  12. Yeah, of course, I hope people follow the public health recommendations but the point is that , in relative terms, this is not a significant event.
  13. Well, so what? Cancer kills more than WW2, heart disease kills more too. That's a stupid statement. Smoking, not wearing seatbelts, impaired driving, eating at MacDonald's 5 times a week probably all kill more than WW2.
  14. Was just going to post the same thing but see that you have beat me to it. I don't live in Ontario and DF is not "my" guy but kinda looks like he's doing a pretty good job dealing with this issue. Some reporter today tried to get him to criticize Truedope and he wouldn't take the bait. (Good thing they didn't ask me!)