Mitch Cronin

Donating Member
  • Content count

    8,154
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    70

Mitch Cronin last won the day on September 29 2016

Mitch Cronin had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

363 Excellent

About Mitch Cronin

  • Rank
    Trying to be a Good Dog
  • Birthday 01/23/1959

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    The Doghouse
  • Interests
    almost everything

Recent Profile Visitors

3,948 profile views
  1. Holy mother of ignorance! Most living, sentient, human-like critters learned the dangers of "just doing what I'm told" from the mayhem of WWII.... is it really possible that some folks today have missed, or forgotten that lesson on morality?
  2. ... all I can say is whoever titled this thread forgot the rest of the sentence: Trump Wins - The rest of the world loses.
  3. Holy crap Malcolm! Congratulations! You're starting to ask the right questions! ....now you just need to start trying to see our globe without all those imaginary political boundaries on it, and keep following through with your train of thought.
  4. ... The only man I've ever seen who could handle an airplane like it was extension of his own body. Sorry to hear of this. He will be missed by many! ... and so it goes.
  5. Partially, certainly! ..... Some think we're too late... we've already begun the self sustaining 'snowball' toward a world humans can't live on... That, even if we somehow magically stopped all fossil fuel burning today, levels of CO2 in the upper atmosphere would continue to increase for about 10 years, bringing us well past the point (which the argument says we've passed anyway) of no return due to feedback loops, leading Earth to a "runaway greenhouse" Venus twin. ...and we all know there's no magic at the moment that'll even slow fossil fuel burning, let alone stopping it. Others will highly encourage any and all individual efforts to stem the tide, as in the 'every little bit counts' methodology, encouraging us to believe that some technology for reversal through CO2 collection will eventually become a reality... but in the mean time, any little bit we can do to limit the peak effects would be very wise. One thing that is rarely mentioned is that our insistence on remaining omnivores is responsible for an enormous contribution to the overall problem. Grazing areas alone consume zillions of acres of would-be/once-was forest; replacing CO2 consuming/oxygen generators with methane producers. Good to see your linked article!
  6. Now for some truth: http://www.nnvl.noaa.gov/MediaDetail2.php?MediaID=1929&MediaTypeID=1 Sep 15, 2016 2016 Arctic Sea Ice Ties for Second Lowest On September 10, 2016, Arctic sea ice extent shrank to 4.14 million square kilometers (1.60 million square miles). The National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) announced that this summer low was statistically tied with the minimum of 2007 for second-lowest in the satellite record, both behind the 2012 record low. The map shows Arctic sea ice concentration as measured by satellites on September 10, 2016. Areas with at least 15% ice cover appear in shades of gray-blue to white. Open ocean water (less than 15% ice cover) is navy blue. The yellow line shows the median (middle of the range) sea ice extent for 1981–2010. For more information, see the NSIDC link below or read the full story at Climate.gov. Click here for an unlabeled version. Real-time sea ice data can be access in NOAA View here.
  7. Gullible: gul·li·ble ˈɡələb(ə)l/ adjective easily persuaded to believe something; credulous. "an attempt to persuade a gullible public to spend their money" synonyms: credulous, naive, overtrusting, overtrustful, easily deceived, easily taken in, exploitable, dupable, impressionable, unsuspecting, unsuspicious, unwary, ingenuous, innocent, inexperienced, unworldly, green; Gullibility is a failure of social intelligence in which a person is easily tricked or manipulated into an ill-advised course of action. It is closely related to credulity, which is the tendency to believe unlikely propositions that are unsupported by evidence. Classes of people especially vulnerable to exploitation due to gullibility include children, the elderly, and the developmentally disabled.
  8. I read somewhere yesterday that some 'official'-honky-tonk outfit had declared that the USA is no longer a democracy. First question that came to my mind: "How long did it take you to figure that out?"... if that wasn't abundantly clear, at least by the end of 2000, then it's surprising the noodles finally starting firing! She's a Corporatocracy....and that'll probably define the term in history books... if there's any left. ...anyway, this ones's for you Defcon, and Jaydee...: https://medium.com/rx3-magazine/its-not-okay-to-hate-hillary-clinton-26774ef5d672#.ehvnbh6ze Jennifer HoelzerFollow Writer, communications strategist and recovering Congressional staffer. 4 days ago It’s Not Okay to Hate Hillary Clinton I’m not saying you have to like Hillary. If you want to disagree with her policy positions or express concerns about her record and/or leadership style, I may not agree with you, but you have a right to your opinion. But to hate her? Really??!!! Hate is a singular sentiment. One that implies enmity or as Freud put it a “wish to destroy the source of unhappiness.” We’ve criminalized it. Religion calls it a sin. The Apostle John even went so far as to write that he “whoever hateth his brother is a murderer.” Hate racism. Hate genocide. Hate people who kick puppies and scam seniors out of their life savings. But to hate a woman who has literally spent her life helping others…what’s wrong with you? Seriously. We’re talking about a woman who personally went undercover to help prove racial discrimination…who graduated from Yale Law School and — instead of going to work for a high-priced law firm — took a job with theChildren’s Defense Fund. Yeah, what a horrible, terrible person. Today, we take it for granted that children with disabilities can go to public schools, but you know what? We get to take that for granted, in part, because Hillary Clinton spent a chunk of 1973 going door to door to learn exactly what was holding children with disabilities back. Yeah, I know, you think she’s a power hungry bitch…but, let’s talk about that for a second. As First Lady of Arkansas, Hillary Clinton used her power to reform Arkansas schools. As First Lady of the United States, she used her power to fight for foster kids and helped pass a law that — to this day — guarantees that millions of children can see doctors. As a U.S. Senator, she used her power to stand up for first responders and extend veterans’ health benefits to members of the national guard and reserves. As Secretary of State, she visited 112 countries, and she spent those visits, not just meeting with government officials, but also visiting schools and shelters and just plain looking for ways to empower women and other victims of oppression. More than one activist has said they’re alive simply because Hillary Clinton took a picture with them. Yes, by doing something as simple as sharing her limelight, she made dissidents more difficult to silence. Now, what exactly have you done? No, I don’t know about you, but if that’s what Hillary Clinton does with power, then I’m glad she’s hungry for more. Hell, I want her to have more. Oh, but…she’s a LIAR and a CRIMINAL!! Seriously? Are you really that gullible? I mean, who told you that? One of her opponents? A surrogate for one of her opponents? A conservative media outlet that has spent decades supporting her opponents? News flash: political opponents aren’t college professors. Contrary to popular belief, the veritable army of candidates and strategists, who’ve spent the last 30 years trying to “defeat” Hillary (from the right and — at times — the left) have never once asked themselves: “What’s the fairest criticism we can raise about Hillary Clinton?” No, they ask themselves: “How can we convince people to hate Hillary Clinton?” And they’ve spent hundreds of millions of dollars on consultants, focus groups, ads, mailings and the aforementioned surrogates to both figure out how to make you hate her and to convince you to hate her. Want to fix money in politics? Here’s an idea: STOP FALLING FOR THE STUFF THAT MONEY BUYS. And that doesn’t include the countless hours and millions of taxpayer dollars Congressional Republicans have spent on investigations that have proved she did little to nothing wrong. Yeah, I know, they discovered that she used one personal email account for all of her correspondence instead of using separate official and personal email accounts, that would have required her to carry two devices. Well…guess what?!! So did I. That’s right, when I worked for a U.S. Senator, I eventually opted to forward my work emails to my gmail account, so I could carry one device. Why? Because it was easier…because I had a lot on my plate and was less likely to miss an important message if all of my messages were on the same device…but mostly because the people who make women’s professional clothing have for some reason decided that members of my gender don’t need pockets. Why? I don’t know, but try running from meeting to meeting carrying two smart phones — plus whatever you need for those meetings — without functional pockets, and I guarantee you’ll want to consolidate your emails on a single device too. Yes, Hillary could have avoided this entire scandal had she used two separate devices, instant messenger or just picked up the phone. (If only she’d had Slack!!!) But do you really think that disqualifies her from being president? Because if adherence to email protocols is the quality you look for in deciding who will best run the country, I’m pretty sure Hillary Clinton will never not use two separate email accounts ever again. Hillary’s opponents call her a liar, even though objective accounts have repeatedly shown her to be “fundamentally honest and trustworthy” if not one of the most honest politicians on the national stage. They blame her for Benghazi even though seven separate investigations have cleared her of wrongdoing. That’s right. Seven. They’ve accused her of murder without evidence. Rudy Giuliani even recently accused Hillary of lying about coming back to New York after 9/11, even though photographs show her standing next to him. AP Photo of Mayor Giuliani and Secretary Clinton taken September 12, 2001. Hell, that veritable army of candidates, strategists and surrogates have even managed to convince you that the fact that her family runs a global charity that has given millions of people access to clean water, economic opportunities and life-saving medications is a reason to vote against her. You’re kidding me right? Yes, I’m aware that said global charity has accepted donations from foreign countries, but are you aware that no one with the last name of Clinton has ever taken a salaryfrom the foundation that bears their name? That means, all of the money the Clintons have raised for their foundation has gone to help other people, not them. It also means that, RNC Chair Reince Priebus lied to you when he said that the Clinton Foundation’s sole purpose is “lining the pockets of Bill and Hillary Clinton.” But, you think she’s the liar? Okay, so maybe the hundreds of millions of dollars spent to vilify Hillary isn’t what convinced you to hate her. No, you just hate her because…you know, she sounds like your mother, she chooses her words carefully and she’s — OMG the horror!! — a “career politician.” Wow. And you think those are good reasons to hate someone? More importantly, you do realize this isn’t a reality singing competition? We are actually deciding who should get control of our country’s nuclear codes, here. Yes, I get that when we elect someone president, we’re signing on to listen to them for four years. But your viewing enjoyment is not the only thing at stake when we elect a president. I mean, we all know that — as a U.S. Senator — Hillary Clinton voted to authorize the use of force in Iraq, but ask yourself this: Would we have gone to war in Iraq had Hillary been president in 2002 instead of George W. Bush? Would a Hillary Clinton administration have led a rush to judgement, tortured prisoners into giving bad intelligence and refused to listen to anyone who disagreed with her? You are welcome to disagree, but I’m pretty sure the answer is “no.” Yes, who we elect as our president matters. Don’t we want someone who’s careful with their words, who listens to outside opinions and isn’t too full of herself to change her mind? When we select athletes to represent our country at the Olympics, we not only measure their skill at their sport, we recognize that Michael Phelps’s skill as a swimmer actually has a lot to do with the many years he spent training. And yet, in this race to decide who should be our nation’s chief negotiator, the person who decides if and when to send our troops into battle, the person who will lead the world’s most complex economy and diverse nation of people into the future…you think experience is a bad thing? Or maybe that’s not it at all. Maybe you hate Hillary because it pains you to see a woman stand up and tell the world how awesome she is. It pains you because, what? Women are supposed to play small and diminish their accomplishments to make you feel better about yourself? Well, if that’s the case, then all I can say is, your hate says a lot more about you, than it does about Hillary. This last week, as Donald Trump broke the record for lowering the bar and the known political universe made it very clear why people are tired of “politics as usual,” any political adviser worth his salt would have told Hillary to keep her head down and take the win. But what did Hillary do? She proposed a plan to fight poverty. As one pundit pointed out (without covering the actual substance of her plan) it was a bit like an A student doing an assignment for extra credit. Some people will, undoubtedly, see that level of earnestness as yet another reason to hate her, I’m pretty sure it’s one of the many reasons she’ll make a great president. Note: When I first published this, I decided I wouldn’t read the comments (not good for my mental health)...I cheated a few times and called out some haters, but largely stayed away, as I tried to convince myself everyone LOVED it and was super supportive of my writing…and then a friend popped my happy bubble and told me the virulence was just as bad as I feared… Anyway, to be clear, I believe passionately in free speech, but I wrote this piece because I’m tired of the hate. I think it’s eating us and our country from the inside and making it harder and harder to have a rational debate...at a time we really need that debate. And upon further reflection, I’ve decided that I just can’t provide a space to promote more hate, at least not on a piece I wrote to push back on it. If you want to respectfully disagree with what I’ve written or with something another commenter writes, I welcome your thoughts. But if you can’t express your ideas with respect, if all you want to do is defend your right to hate or call me hateful names because I happen to disagree with your point of views, Medium gives me the right to hide/report your comments and I’m going to exercise that right. And no — for the record — I’m not censoring your point of view, I’m requiring you to express it with respect. Thank you for reading and if you like what I wrote and think it would be helpful for others, recommendations and encouragement are appreciated.
  9. Did you realize this was a 10 yr old thread before posting that?
  10. At least half the folks on this planet shouldn't be here...... Too many hamsters! I'll volunteer...
  11. What an unbelievable spin of pure BS. Defcon, you've been had. The spin masters have apparently found the precise avenue they could lead you down.
  12. Gee, I wonder if the intellectuals among Trump's supporters are engaged in any similar discussions regarding critical thought? For my own part, with most 'A or B' style questions, I guess I tend to take all the information I collect and things I observe and sort of chuck them on a scale in my head... over time the scale tends to lead me in one direction or another..... In some cases, it takes magnification and a vernier scale to make a decision... In other cases, such as Trump vs. Clinton... before I've even had my first cup of coffee in the morning, and from a long distance, I can still see Clinton's half of that scale resting on the ground while Trump's is swinging wildly, way up high in the breeze. I can't even imagine where one has to look, or - something? - in order to find something that bears the slightest resemblance to 'reason' for concluding Trump would be the better choice!? ..... maybe if he was running against that **bleep** who just trippled the price of the Epi-Pen?.... or Larry, Darryl and Darryl?
  13. Jump to the 3 minute mark if you get impatient...
  14. I'd guess Alberta will win the How-pretty-can-you-arrange-the-deck-chairs contest, but Ontario will probably take second prize.