Donating Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by seeker

  1. Also in the same statement, Boeing chairman and chief executive Dennis Muilenburg, said: "This is a defining moment for Boeing. Nothing is more important to us than the safety of the flight crews and passengers who fly on our airplanes. Hollow words based on the corporate decisions made by the company in it's development/rollout of the Max. "We totally care about safety" says the company after it's been caught compromising safety.
  2. "Diversity in Leadership: Air Canada" I don't even want to know.
  3. If Alberta, and Saskatchewan too (cause they're more willing to go than Alberta is) separate I will move there ASAP!
  4. Yikes, what a piece of work!
  5. seeker


    Well, that's not really what I'm saying. Haha. Just replying to MD2's comment about everything AC is bad. AC was poorly run and hobbled with all sorts of impediments and, let's be honest, much of Westjet's success was due to those factors. Not all of course, hardworking, energetic employees who went above and beyond was certainly key to WS's success too but as we've seen over the last few years the situation has reversed to some degree. I don't wish anything negative for Westjet - there's certainly room for both companies. What's that saying; the best system of government is a benevolent King, the worst system of government is an evil King. Well, Westjet just got taken over by a King so the question is; what kind of King is he?
  6. seeker


    Wouldn't bank too much on the "far better labour relations" - lots of discontent amongst the pilots based on my random discussions with Westjet pilots and the huge number of them that have applied, and been hired, by AC. As for the rest of it; the "far lower" costs have become "little bit lower costs, the "stronger presence in the leisure market" has become "slightly stronger presence in the leisure market", "lots of room to grow" must be balanced against the stronger entrenched competitors and "knowing how to make money", well, not nearly as much and as easy as before. Many, many ways this could go badly. As the reports suggest, it's likely that some of the costs associated with the buyout will be downloaded to WS and if Onex cancels or reduces the profit-sharing or if the last vestiges of the "Owner" culture disappear the ability to make money could disappear too. I have many friends at WS and I hope this goes well for them but on the whole I think this is a negative for the employees.
  7. I bet if you do a search on the interwebs you'll be able to find that exact thing (although I'm not going to be the one to check). Rule 34.
  8. Are you saying that a woman is not capable of being a janitor? I hope not because a woman can do anything a man can do you know!
  9. I remember riding in the back of a Westjet flight and the PA included something along the lines of; "Welcome onboard our newest 737 MAX" Heavy emphasis on the "Max". I'll bet that changes to "welcome onboard Westjet flight xxx" to avoid having a stampede of guests heading for the door.
  10. I'd bet dollars to burritos that it's simply designed to spook Boeing into giving a larger compensation cheque. Seems pretty transparent as Southwest would have to swallow some substantial costs to add a different airframe and Boeing knows it. I say, call their bluff, since Southwest is the reason that the world has been saddled with that piece of junk anyway.
  11. I've said it before - if Southwest's Flight Ops management had stood up to the beancounters back when they were deciding on the how the aircraft should be configured based on the next quarter's numbers everyone would have been better off.
  12. Yes, some posts are biased according to the beliefs of the poster and some linked articles are biased too but I was responding specifically to the bit - " Perhaps then every one would understand how they are being manipulated by the few to gain control." I don't feel like anyone is manipulating me to gain control (here on the forum) so maybe that means I'm the one doing the manipulating - although that doesn't feel right either.
  13. Do you mean "here" like here on the forum or "here" like here in Canada?
  14. Yes, seemed like it could have been a good article based on the "claimed" expertise of the writer in both aviation and software design. Unfortunately the error in assessing the effect of moving the thrust line casts doubt on the validity of anything else he wrote. There is a possibility that the new engine could have been canted upward slightly which would have changed the thrust line but I have not seen anything about this while I have seen expert commentary on the effect of the larger cowls at higher AoAs so that's the likely impetus for the MCAS.
  15. Too bad future employees won't be on the DB plan. Well, pilots anyway, can't remember what's happening with the other groups.
  16. OK, a little confusing when you said "close the loophole, just don't tax it." They are closing the loophole - by taxing those that do it as a business. This seems to be the course of action that will have the least effect on those that are not doing it as a business. A typical government move would have been to say you are limited to only a certain number of trades per month or per year - this could have severely constrained the average person. It's surprisingly sophisticated for the criteria to include number of trades, investment knowledge of the investor and time spent researching the trades (although I don't know exactly what this means or how it's measured).
  17. I'm fundamentally opposed to taxes but on this one I might agree with JT. The name is "Tax Free Savings Account" not "Tax Free Trading Account". I think this is aimed at those few (rare) individuals who are very active and have a high level of knowledge about the industry. Think about people who are currently employed as traders at a major institution and do multiple trades per day in their personal TFSA. This is not aimed at the average joe. I have a pretty large TFSA but only do a few trades per year and am employed outside the financial industry - not going to affect me.
  18. There's the post I was waiting for. I don't fly the 737, never have, and I've been waiting for a succinct summation of the issue. Thank you.
  19. OK, sorry, my mistake. I was responding to the news report which calls the thing a simulator. My point was that it's not a certified FFS. I am aware of FTDs and realize that they are also certified. You're correct, the pilot's actions and description in the video are accurate but we could sit in front of a couple of flight deck posters and point at the switches with the same accuracy - proves nothing and reveals nothing about what happened.
  20. Well, clearly it's not a certified device - there's only one pilot seat, one PFD, one CC. Sure, he demonstrates turning off some switches but without a shaker, bad airspeed data, a moving trim wheel and inputs from a bad MCAS its pointless. Did you watch Sully (the movie)? Remember the part where the test pilots showed how he could have and should have landed in Teterboro?
  21. That little "simulator" re-enactment shown is completely useless. It's not a simulator at all. It's some homemade toy. Not certified. If you look closely you can see that the trim wheel is not even functional. Whoever that guy is he's doing a great disservice to us all spewing misleading nonsense.
  22. Even more worrying is that the system resets after every pilot intervention which allows for multiple 2.5 degree inputs from the MCAS.
  23. Here's another good JBP video. Somewhat mis-titled though, should be more like "JBP discusses attitudes toward immigration." Video is 15 minutes long and appears to be off-topic as the first bit is laying groundwork for some later conclusions/statements about political attitudes toward immigration.