New FAA Rule regarding Sharing Pilot Records

[Guest1]

I wonder how many other countries will follow suit? 

 

FAA Home ▸ News ▸ Press Releases & Statements

Press Release – FAA Completes Rule Establishing Pilot Records Database to Increase Safety

• Share
• 

For Immediate Release

May 26, 2021
Contact: pressoffice@faa.gov

---

WASHINGTON – A new rule from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will enable the sharing of pilot records among employers in an electronic database maintained by the agency. The final rule (PDF) for the Pilot Records Database requires air carriers and certain other operators to report pilots’ employment history, training, and qualifications to the database. The rule also requires air carriers and certain operators to review records contained in the database when considering pilots for employment.

“It has been a long journey for the families of Colgan Flight 3407, but their tireless advocacy and continued engagement with the FAA has made this database a reality. With it, employers will be able to quickly and thoroughly make informed hiring decisions to keep our skies safe,” said FAA Administrator Steve Dickson.

The rule will update the current records reporting process to meet information-sharing requirements in the Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Administration Extension Act passed by Congress in 2010. Once the transition period is complete, the database will serve as the repository for pilot records from the FAA and records reported by current and previous employers.

The database will include the following information:

• FAA pilot certificate information, such as certificates and ratings;
• FAA summaries of unsatisfactory pilot applications for new certificates or ratings;
• FAA records of accidents, incidents, and enforcement actions;
• Records from employers on pilot training, qualification, and proficiency;
• Pilot drug and alcohol records;
• Employers’ final disciplinary action records;
• Pilot records concerning separation of employment; and
• Verification of pilot motor vehicle driving record.

The final rule (PDF) takes effect 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. Additional actions and timelines to support implementation of the rule include:

• Six months after the rule is published, operators must begin reviewing FAA records electronically in the database instead of submitting a form requesting records;
• One year after the rule is published, operators will begin to report and review records to the database; and
• Operators will have three years and 90 days to transition and fully comply with the rule.

The FAA will publish an advisory circular to accompany the final rule and will offer additional resources to support industry adoption and use of the database. The rule has been thoroughly debated and incorporates feedback from all aviation stakeholders.

###

[Innuendo]

Quote

I wonder how many other countries will follow suit?

Not to mention other fields of employment, 

[Seeker]

2 hours ago, Innuendo said:

Not to mention other fields of employment, 

Yup, if it's a good rule for pilots it must also be a good rule for Doctors, nurses, busdrivers, truckdrivers and Subway Sandwich Artists.

[Guest1]

1 hour ago, seeker said:

Yup, if it's a good rule for pilots it must also be a good rule for Doctors, nurses, busdrivers, truckdrivers and Subway Sandwich Artists.

A good rule indeed.  There have been a number of incidents that involved false credentials etc.  

[Seeker]

Here is a 20 minute video discussing the Atlas Air crash in Texas in 2019 that directly addresses this issue:

 

[Don Hudson]

This process casts a wide net and is a good addition to airline flight-safety programs' kit. Logbook certification similarly needs verification.

In aviation, the "80-20" rule is much closer to a "95-5" rule because the costs of cheating are, (unlike in politics), really high and usually swift and final.

The layered approach to flight safety works. At individual airlines, FOQA/FDA/FDM programs, in concert with just-culture safety reporting systems, provide both a daily (morning report) and long-term trending analysis which supports flight safety programs vertically, up-and-down within an organization's structure but only work as well as the support it receives from the executive management.

Such programs can be a last defence in highlighting non-normal, outlier operations that need an explanation.

 

Edited May 28, 2021 by Don Hudson

[Moon The Loon]

On 5/28/2021 at 12:15 PM, Don Hudson said:

This process casts a wide net and is a good addition to airline flight-safety programs' kit. Logbook certification similarly needs verification.

If there was any single take-away from my very few years of international contract flying, it is this very thing. In four different contract agencies, I witnessed three agencies that did not do full diligence on its candidates. If my very limited exposure to such practice is any indication, the fraudulent application of pilot licensing credentials is rampant. Thank the gods I'm retiring!!!

[Don Hudson]

hm, I wonder if my 95-5 is a bit optimistic...