Kip Powick Posted October 19, 2003 Share Posted October 19, 2003 1) Y’know you are right !! I just checked and what I posted is completely wrong. 2) I never thought about from that perspective. Let me reconsider what I posted and I’ll repost. 3) Well I don’t agree with you but based on what you posted I think you have a few valid points. Perhaps we’re both correct …to a certain degree. 4) Sorry, I didn’t realize that was the question. I read your post too quickly. 5) My reply was not exactly what I intended to say. It made sense to me but I think I know where you are coming from and I apologize if it appeared to be a personal attack…because it was not. 6) I think we are both guilty of trying to twist the facts to reinforce our personal point of view…what say we either drop the subject, or at least start over. 7) It was meant to be tongue in cheek humour but I guess I blew it..No offense intended, OK? 8) Thanks for the reply and I appreciate the info you have passed on. 9) Well I think I know what you are trying to say but why not rephrase it so that others do not find it so very prejudicial . 10) I think that if AC seriously considered interchangeable next-generation capability and coupled it with integrated management decentralization as well as systematized virtual contingency plans, the employees would fully understand the consequences of object-oriented faultless extrapolation of responsive management consequences, don’t you??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitch Cronin Posted October 19, 2003 Share Posted October 19, 2003 I was just about to pop in here and say I've seen similar things said... and then I realized you'd said "not often"... I guess that's true, but I'm still personally somewhat impressed to see some of those things are said ...more often than seldom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st27 Posted October 19, 2003 Share Posted October 19, 2003 I guess I could have saved some keystrokes if I just typed "please refer to #7" re:tribute Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest RegAme Posted October 19, 2003 Share Posted October 19, 2003 "10) I think that if AC seriously considered interchangeable next-generation capability and coupled it with integrated management decentralization as well as systematized virtual contingency plans, the employees would fully understand the consequences of object-oriented faultless extrapolation of responsive management consequences, don’t you???" Huh?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kip Powick Posted October 19, 2003 Author Share Posted October 19, 2003 Number 10.............. A sentence made up of todays trendy "buzz-words" that would, upon first glance, appear to make the author know a lot more than you do........ but it is all absolute bullsh$t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sky High Posted October 20, 2003 Share Posted October 20, 2003 Well you had me up until #10. I'm still trying to figure that one out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st27 Posted October 21, 2003 Share Posted October 21, 2003 A classic example of the 3B's === Bull.... baffles brains Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.