I.A.M. Air Canada vs. Canadien

[conehead]

Lorden appoints new referee.

Does it never end???

http://iam764.ca/DesktopModules/ViewDocument.aspx?DocumentID=284

[Guest wirepuller]

not unexpected.The CAIL component of the IAM has been whining ever since the "Adam's award" came out. Despite having been told to cease and desist from the executive the local lodges still spend our dues to challenge this. The same brothers who tell you not to work o/t (even though it is all time banked) and even if it is for emergency relief, i.e.:mechanicals out of town because there are people laid off. Obviously they don't care about customers that are stuck there and the cost involved in caring for them.

[Commander Data]

That's a rather one sided view.

In any case, this particular issue is primarily to deal with those who held bid positions, or "above basic" positions, at airlines that later became Canadian Airlines, yet at Air Canada, were not credited with time since being awarded that bid position.

[Guest AME]

Then there's the ex CRA CCs in YYC who were awarded "Above basic" and had never bid the position ie: their process was one of assignment rather than bid.

Brett

[Guest AME]

Then there's the ex CRA CCs in YYC who were awarded "Above basic" and had never bid the position ie: their process was one of assignment rather than bid.

There is also at least ex CDN person in YYC who held recall rights to both the process auditors (Inspector) position and LLAT

Brett