Jump to content

Response to Nail: Re: Repost


cp fa

Recommended Posts

Had to start a new thread, couldn't reply below.

My understanding of the situation is that ACPA was given an amount of money that they were required to save, and they looked at their priorities, in terms of pensions and job losses, then came up with a percentage wage cut to meet that goal. That is why the final percentage has not been announced - it is still being calculated. That is also presumably why it is potentially going to be greater than the 15% that the company asked for in the first place.

Those retirement packages did not come out of the company's coffers, they are coming out of the pockets of the members. I would like to see that made perfectly clear before it ends up on the front page of the Toronto Star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...