Sign in to follow this  

Reality 2020

Recommended Posts

OPINION | An offer Alberta couldn't refuse


Here's a radical idea to bring western alienation to heel, once and for all

Max Fawcett · for CBC News · Posted: Jul 23, 2020 5:00 AM MT | Last Updated: 3 hours ago
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shakes hands with Alberta Premier Jason Kenney on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. Max Fawcett says it's time for Trudeau to acknowledge the massive contributions Albertans have made to confederation. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

This column is an opinion from Max Fawcett, a freelance writer and the former editor of Alberta Oil magazine.


When Jason Kenney tabled the report from his "fair deal panel" last month, it effectively opened a new front in his own long-running conflict with the federal Liberal government.


But the latest results from a long-running survey on Canadian attitudes from the Environics Institute suggests he might want to reconsider this particular fight.

After all, the proportion of Albertans who feel so mistreated by the rest of Canada that they support independence dropped from 56 per cent to 43 per cent — and that's from a survey that was conducted before COVID-19 hit. 

Kenney's government has yet to really thank Ottawa for its numerous interventions. Those include spending $1.7 billion to help Alberta address its growing orphan well problem and a series of loan guarantee programs for the oil and gas industry as well as national programs like the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) or the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS). 

Even so, it's hard to imagine that Albertans will be totally blind to the contributions that Ottawa is making right now — and that they'd somehow be more enthusiastic about the idea of separating from Canada as a result.

But if Justin Trudeau wants to bring western alienation to heel once and for all, he should do something even more radical: actually address the concerns of western Canadians. 

Ottawa has made numerous contributions to Alberta lately, including spending $1.7 billion to help the province address its growing orphan well problem. (Orphan Well Association)

No, that doesn't mean changing the equalization formula, if only because there is no possible change that would make Alberta a beneficiary of the program.

Despite a downturn in oil and gas prices that has been going on for almost six years now, Albertans still earn far more than other Canadians. According to Statistics Canada, the median household income in Alberta was $72,700 in 2018 — more than $10,000 higher than the national figure.

If those incomes do eventually drop down below the national median, the minutiae of the equalization formula will be the least of Alberta's concerns. 

But it does mean acknowledging that Albertans have been massive net contributors to confederation this century, and doing something to recognize that investment.

Yes, the federal government bought and is building the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, but that's as much about protecting its financial interests as it is about advancing Alberta's.

And while Ottawa has expressed a willingness to reconsider the terms of its fiscal stabilization program, which effectively acts as an insurance policy for provinces that experience major decreases in their revenues, the figures being discussed amount to a rounding error on Alberta's historical contributions. 

That's why the federal government should make Alberta's political leaders an offer they almost certainly couldn't refuse.

A program to acknowledge Alberta's contributions

It should acknowledge those historical outflows, and offer to create a program that would prevent them from happening in the future.

Above a certain threshold — say, $4,000 per capita — any surplus contributions by a province's taxpayers would be rebated to them by the federal government, on an equal basis to everyone over the age of 18.

For example, Alberta taxpayers kicked in $22.4 billion more than they received back in federal program spending in 2015. Using that $4,000 per capita threshold, that would leave $5.8 billion to distribute to the approximately three million adults in Alberta — or a cheque for nearly $2,000.

This would have a few obvious advantages.

First, it would more closely bind Albertans to the federal government, and remind them of their relationship with Ottawa and the benefits that come from it.

Second, it would help reduce income inequality within the province, as those who paid more in federal taxes would receive proportionately less back in rebates. For a federal government that's clearly interested in fighting poverty and growing the middle class, this would be an obvious win.

And third, it's a program that might never actually send much money back to Albertans, given that the days of $100 per barrel oil (and, just as importantly, $5 per mcf natural gas) are pretty clearly behind us. 

Hundreds of people rallied in Edmonton last year in support of the western provinces separating from Canada. By creating a program that would ensure that Albertans are repaid in kind for their contributions to confederation, the federal government could take the wind out of the sails of western alienation, says Max Fawcett. (Gabriel Brown/CBC)

As such, it might ultimately end up as a bluff that never gets called — but one that could still defuse tensions and shore up support for federalism in the regions where it's most often under attack.

By acknowledging the historical contributions that Albertans have made to confederation, and creating a program that would ensure that they're repaid in kind in the future, the federal government could permanently take the wind out of the sails of western alienation.

It would be a fitting legacy for a prime minister whose father both defeated one separatist movement while in office and potentially laid the groundwork for another. 

Ironically, the biggest hurdle here might be the prime minister's own partisan interests in Alberta.

Wexit vote split could help Trudeau more

While sending voters cheques with a Canadian flag on them could theoretically help the Liberals win back a few seats in Alberta, allowing the Wexit party to split the federal conservative vote would help far more.

Even a modest splitting of that vote would put a handful of seats in Edmonton and Calgary in play, and possibly position the Liberals to improve on their record four-seat showing in 2015. 

Jason Kenney isn't necessarily safe from any Wexit-related blowback, either.

As University of Alberta political scientist Jared Wesley noted on a recent episode of the West of Centre podcast, "Calling a 'strategic referendum' can have unintended consequences. We've seen that most recently in the UK a few years ago, when [then prime minister David] Cameron thought he knew what the outcome of the Brexit referendum would be. So they're playing a very dangerous game."

That's a game the federal Liberals may well be tempted to let play out, given the possible upside.

Then again, they may look at the disastrous outcome of Brexit and decide that the risk isn't worth any partisan reward.

If that's the case, they should move forward with a promise to return any excess contributions to confederation that Albertans might make in the future.

Yes, that could theoretically cost the federal treasury billions of dollars. But losing Alberta would surely cost much, much more.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally some good news.  

Two of the greatest....if I was able to call the matchup, these two would be it: 


Boxing greats Mike Tyson, Roy Jones Jr. announce September L.A. fight

Tyson, 54, is set to fight Jones, 51, in a pay-per-view exhibition match on September 12

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/24/2020 at 3:20 AM, Wolfhunter said:

Finally some good news.  

Two of the greatest....if I was able to call the matchup, these two would be it: 


Boxing greats Mike Tyson, Roy Jones Jr. announce September L.A. fight

Tyson, 54, is set to fight Jones, 51, in a pay-per-view exhibition match on September 12

Go to some red neck bars and for free you can watch a couple of middle aged men get into it.  😀

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Wolfhunter said:

A Michigan woman has been arrested after investigators say viral video showed her torching an SUV and sparking an explosion that blew up in her face.

The video showed Sydney Parham, 26, of Fraser, being blown backward and then scrambling to her feet after the explosion, which took place Wednesday in the Detroit suburb of Harrison Township, investigators said.

The video appeared to have been shot from the upper floor of a garden apartment building and showed a woman in a dark hooded jacket and a white coronavirus mask dumping the contents of a red gasoline can into the back of the SUV.

The woman suffered minor cuts and burns in the explosion.

She’s presumed innocent unless proven guilty, like the court said,” defense attorney Vassal Johnson II told reporters


Yup, don't forget, she's innocent until proven guilty.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worth reading I think.The reaction to gang violence in Toronto is another case of logical absurdity IMO.

The author rightly suggests that if white gangs were killing white people in affluent white neighbourhoods with the same frequency we would have called in the army by now. That seems to be the true measure of racism to me.

Edited by Wolfhunter

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this