Jump to content

SWA Pilots allegedly streamed bathroom video to cockpit


ILB

Recommended Posts

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona/2019/10/25/southwest-airlines-lawsuit-pilots-livestreamed-plane-bathroom-flight-attendant-claims/2458570001/

A Phoenix-based Southwest Airlines flight attendant has sued the airline, accusing the Dallas-based carrier of retaliation after she reported spotting two pilots livestreaming video from the lavatory to an iPad in the cockpit on one of her flights.

A suit filed in federal court for the District of Arizona alleges that on Feb. 27, 2017, Renee Steinaker was working as a flight attendant on Flight 1088 between Pittsburgh and Phoenix.

The suit alleges that 2½ hours into the flight, the pilot, Capt. Terry Graham, asked Steinaker to come to the cockpit so that he could leave to use the restroom. Southwest Airlines policy requires two crew members in the cockpit at all times, so Steinaker was asked to staff the cockpit with co-pilot Ryan Russell in Graham's absence.

The suit states that when Steinaker entered the cockpit, she spotted an iPad mounted to the windshield to the left of the captain’s seat. On it, she reportedly could see a live stream of what appeared to be Graham in the bathroom.

The filing states that Russell looked panicked and told her the cameras were a new top-secret security measure that had been installed in all Southwest Airlines planes, which Steinaker did not believe to be true.

"They led her to believe that she and others had been filmed — had been videotaped if you will — while they were using the lavatory. It's really hard to imagine a more outrageous kind of conduct," aviation attorney Ronald L.M. Goldman, who is representing Steinaker, told the Arizona Republic. Goldman is a senior partner at Baum Hedlund Aristei Goldman, with offices in California, Pennsylvania and Washington, DC.

According to the court filing, Steinaker took a photograph of the iPad with her cellphone to document the incident.

Upon landing, the pilots violated airline protocol and "disembarked, leaving the aircraft unattended by piloting staff," Steinaker alleges in the suit. It also claims that Graham "left a loaded firearm unattended in the cockpit, a violation of FAA regulations."

Steinaker and other crew members reported the incident to the airline. The suit claims the pilots were allowed to proceed to their next flight and they continue to fly with the airline today.

Steinaker claims she was told not to talk to anybody about the incident and was warned that "if this got out, if this went public, no one, I mean no one, would ever fly our airline again."

Goldman also represents Steinaker's husband, David, also a Southwest flight attendant.

The suit alleges the Steinakers have faced retaliation through stalking, being monitored by managers in a "threatening and bizarre manner" and being subjected to an increased number of performance audits.

"In my view, Southwest Airlines has treated this as 'how dare they report it' rather than 'thank you for letting us know,'" Goldman said.

In an emailed statement to the Arizona Republic, a representative for Southwest Airlines said:

"The safety and security of our employees and customers is Southwest’s uncompromising priority. As such, Southwest does not place cameras in the lavatories of our aircraft. At this time, we have no other comment on the pending litigation."

We reached out to the attorney representing the two pilots named in the suit by email and phone. We will update this story when we receive a response.

In court, attorneys for the pilots have denied that the two engaged in livestreaming the lavatory. Court filings also deny that the two violated any airline policy or protocol.

To Goldman, the incident indicates both privacy and safety concerns.

"In my opinion as an aviation lawyer with many years of experience, this does compromise the safety of flight and the safety of passengers, not even to mention for the potential of violating the privacy of all of the passengers as well as the crew," Goldman said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While not defending the pilots, since I have no idea what the facts are, there's some holes in the story: where could you possible hide a camera? (as mentioned by Super 80), and, if she thought there was a camera, why didn't she look for it after leaving the F/D? 

She's claiming that the pilots set up a hidden camera to record/transmit video from the Lav and then the Capt left his ipad displaying the video feed while going back to use the same Lav allowing himself to be recorded?  And then, one of two subsequent claims; that the pilot removed the camera before returning to the F/D (we don't know, doesn't say in the article) or she didn't think of looking for it?  Oh, BTW, both her and her husband have been "subjected to subjected to an increased number of performance audits" and being monitored by management. 

Hmmm.  Gotta say; the Occam's Razor guy in my head thinks that maybe the "increased number of performance audits" and being monitored by management came before the alleged incident.

Of course, as we all know, reporting on these types of stories (or any incident) is notoriously unreliable.  Maybe the article is incorrect or incomplete and it really did happen?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Years ago, I was on board a middle east carrier chatting with the cockpit crew(on the ground) and they showed that as a 'security measure', they had video feeds from the lavs that they could pull up.  Is this something the manufacturers can provide?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet this was a joke gone wrong... Captain leaves the video up and then goes back there where he's on it? Give me a break.

There never was a live stream at all... that's why no camera could be found. I bet the Captain recorded a one time video with his iPad and then does a playback when someone comes up to run his "joke"...

Except this time it was someone with their own set of issues with the airline and looking to be a victim and leverage the opportunity to any advantage they could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, j.k. said:

I bet this was a joke gone wrong... Captain leaves the video up and then goes back there where he's on it? Give me a break.

There never was a live stream at all... that's why no camera could be found. I bet the Captain recorded a one time video with his iPad and then does a playback when someone comes up to run his "joke"...

Except this time it was someone with their own set of issues with the airline and looking to be a victim and leverage the opportunity to any advantage they could.

Yes, agreed.  Someone I work with described trying this exact joke on the FA and ended up with them in the Lav looking for the non-existant camera.  It's like printing up fake ACARS messages to prank the FAs.  Unfortunately they "pranked" the wrong person and got an unexpected reaction.  Now the pilots are in the position of either denying the whole thing or admitting that they were horsing around and using their iPad to play videos in flight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...