deicer Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 We're headed to Logan's Run... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaydee Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 When Politically Correct BS like this happens, I am thankful I am retired because it would be a cold day in hell before I would insult all the real Ladies and Gentlemen on board by calling them anything but. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILB Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 On 10/14/2019 at 4:06 PM, J.O. said: Can’t imagine what life would have been like if we’d had the internet when women were fighting to get the vote. Sometimes forgotten is that while women were enfranchised federally in 1918, for provincial elections Quebec was the last province to grant this right to women in 1940--well before non-status Indians who generally got this right in the early 50s and status Indians around 1960. Men who didn't own property also couldn't vote until around 1920. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 1 hour ago, ILB said: Sometimes forgotten is that while women were enfranchised federally in 1918, for provincial elections Quebec was the last province to grant this right to women in 1940--well before non-status Indians who generally got this right in the early 50s and status Indians around 1960. Men who didn't own property also couldn't vote until around 1920. It all started in Manitoba Two years before, on January 27, 1914, a large group of women and men, many members of the Political Equality League of Manitoba, appeared before the Manitoba Legislative Assembly to make the case for women's suffrage. They were led by well-known writer and suffragist Nellie McClung, who would later be known for her role in the groundbreaking Persons Case. McClung asked the members of the legislature: "Have we not the brains to think? Hands to work? Hearts to feel? And lives to live?" She went on, "Do we not bear our part in citizenship? Do we not help build the Empire? Give us our due!" In December 1915, the group delivered a petition containing almost 40,000 signatures in support of women's right to vote. Premier T.C. Norris delivered the petition to the first session of the 15th Legislature, followed soon after by a Bill to Amend the Manitoba Elections Act. On January 28, 1916, the Lieutenant Governor passed into law the right of Manitoba women to vote – and to put themselves forward as candidates – in provincial elections. Saskatchewan and Alberta Followed 1916 c. 5, both jurisdictions thereby granting women the right to vote and stand for election. On May 24, 1918, following passage of An Act to confer the Electoral Franchise upon Women S.C.Jan 17, 2018 Centennial of women's suffrage - Condition féminine Canada https://cfc-swc.gc.ca › commemoration › cent › index-en Voting in Canada: a short history Canada has been a democracy since Confederation in 1867. Who was been allowed to participate in that democracy has continually evolved since that time. At the time of Confederation, eligibility to vote was restricted on a number of issues, as listed below, but all voters had to be male, and own property of a certain value. Some non-property owners were also permitted to vote, depending on the amount of rent they paid monthly or annually, but the amounts were high enough that they excluded many. The property-based qualifications for voting were gradually removed beginning around 1900, but was not completely removed until 1948. For over 50 years after Confederation, women in Canada were not permitted to vote. That changed for federal elections (and provincially in Nova Scotia) in 1918. The provincial laws giving women the right to vote in provincial elections were also generally introduced around this time, including Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan in 1916 , BC and Ontario in 1917, and Nova Scotia in 1918. Quebec was last to address the issue in 1940. Certain racial or ethnic groups were also excluded from voting in Canada based on being disqualified provincially. For example, Japanese Canadians were denied the right to vote in a federal election until 1948. These exclusions extended to a variety of racial and ethnic groups, all with various limitations on the right to vote based on their province of residence, until the new federal laws in 1948 finally prohibited citizens from being denied their right to vote on the basis of their race. Despite this advancement, certain racialized communities faced continuing exclusion. Similar to the 1948 laws preventing the denial of voting rights due to race, in 1955 laws were introduced ending the exclusion of voters on the basis of their religion. It was not until 1960 that Canada began to address the particularly difficult and complex issue of granting Aboriginal persons the right to vote. Although Aboriginal persons were permitted to vote from the time of Confederation (within the other limits of the time – Aboriginal women would not have been able to vote until 1918), to act upon the right to vote they would have had to give up their status as Aboriginal persons, and rights they had because of that status. After 1960, this sacrifice was no longer required for Aboriginal persons to vote. Much like the acceptance of women’s right to vote, the right for Aboriginal people to vote provincially happened around this time for most provinces. Nova Scotia was unique in having never excluded status Aboriginal men (and women after 1918) from voting; however, due to treaties and societal arrangements, few Aboriginal people were recognized as owners of property – thus excluding many until the property ownership requirement was removed. Various changes have been made over the past number of decades to try to make it easier for people to vote. For example: voting hours were extended to give more time for working people to get to a polling station special polling stations were set up at places such as hospitals and long-term care facilities to encourage seniors to vote more centralized, accessible polling stations were established to make it easier for persons with physical disabilities or limitations to vote. These accessibility changes became law in 1992. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms became law in 1982. Section Three of the Charter guarantees all adult (18 or over) Canadian citizens the right to vote federally or provincially. This Charter protection reflected the collection of changes that had been made over the previous century, and further expanded on those changes by including all citizens. However, Section Three of the Charter was limited in some particular ways which have since been addressed. Between 1988 and 1993 changes were made to address the exclusion of persons with a mental disability from voting. In 1993, persons with mental disability could no longer be disqualified from voting on that basis. Prisoners did not initially have their right to vote protected by Section Three of the Charter. In 1993 the restriction on voting was removed for prisoners serving a sentence of less than two years. In 2002, the Supreme Court of Canada, in a decision called Sauvé v. Chief Electoral Officer, ruled that no prisoner could be disqualified from voting, no matter the length of their sentence. Finally, with the introduction of the Canada Elections Act in 2000, steps were taken to make it possible for persons of no fixed address to be eligible to vote without the traditional documentation required for proof of address. This law continues to face some changes and controversy around exactly what can be used as documentation or as an alternative to prove residence in a riding. However, the basic concept remains that having no fixed address is no longer grounds to be disqualified from voting. Some of the recent changes made, particularly those in the Fair Elections Act, have been criticised by some, such as the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA), Council of Canadians, and Canadian Federation of Students, claiming that the changes infringe upon the Charter protected right to vote. Among the changes that have been seen as especially troubling are: No longer being able to rely on an Elections Canada voter ID card as identification The tightening of rules around vouching for a person without proof of address Limiting the number of voters that one individual can vouch for Additionally, a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision (Frank v. Attorney General of Canada, 2015) has impacted the rights of Canadian citizens who live outside of the country. This case has confirmed that Canadian citizens who have lived outside of the country for 5 years or more, are no longer permitted to participate in Canadian elections. This builds on other recent changes which changed rules about when the 5 year period began. Prior to 2007, a citizen simply had to return to Canada for any purpose to restart the period. Now, that person must return to live in Canada before their right to vote is regained. This change has effectively removed a Charter right from Canadian citizens who live outside of the country. Although these changes may seem insignificant to many, the people affected by these changes are generally groups who already experience difficulty in voting. Heavily impacted populations include seniors, persons with no fixed address, students and Aboriginal persons. Although Canada has come a long way in improving access to the right to vote, many still face hurdles in practicing their Charter protected right. September 2015 This article is written by Dalhousie law student Michael Bourgeois. More information and further reading: Elections Canada – A History of the Vote in Canada Frank v. Canada (Attorney General) Sauvé v. Chief Electoral Officer Further reading: Assembly of First Nations, Federal Election and Voting Information Top 5 Things Students Need to Know about Voting in the Federal Election (Dal News) Guide to voting in the Canadian Federal Election (settlement.org) Accessible voting Voting Information for Transgender Canadians: votingwhiletrans.ca/, and Elections Canada Vote Rights, Canadian Civil Liberties Association Canadian Bar Association: where the parties stand on equal justice 1918, c. 20, women in Canada were granted the federal franchise. It would be another 10 years before the Famous Five won the Persons Case Victory, and it was not until 1940 that Quebec women won the right to vote in provincial elections. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fido Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 Air Canada is going all to hell. First it is buying the 737-Max and then this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeker Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 1 hour ago, Fido said: Air Canada is going all to hell. First it is buying the 737-Max and then this. If you're looking for the incipient event you're going to have to go back a little further than the 737-Max. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fido Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 2 hours ago, seeker said: If you're looking for the incipient event you're going to have to go back a little further than the 737-Max. I left before then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaydee Posted October 24, 2019 Share Posted October 24, 2019 Fast Forward to 3:20 mark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st27 Posted October 24, 2019 Share Posted October 24, 2019 There is starting to be push back ..... first Jordan Peterson and now Piers Morgan: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwiHr57S6rTlAhXRVN8KHe4CAnkQyCkwAHoECAwQBA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DvDT-Yj5n6zE&usg=AOvVaw1UlwVScdtSWyCZWEoOgSXn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kip Powick Posted October 24, 2019 Share Posted October 24, 2019 I hope you folks have forwarded these items, (links), to the Crystal Palace and the Brass Hats within....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.O. Posted October 24, 2019 Share Posted October 24, 2019 LOL. It'd be a cold day in hell before I'd allow Piers Morgan to lecture me on corporate culture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaydee Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Society has gone mad ! Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moeman Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.