Jump to content

Interesting Arrival at Le Bourget


deicer

Recommended Posts

Fun to fly but that approach and landing wasn’t airshow worthy. Boeing doesn’t need anymore help with aircraft sales.

1. Overshot the turn to final. 

2. Touched down hard off the the centerline 

3. Excessive braking only to power up again exiting.

Other than that it was perfect. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Marshall said:

I see the aircraft is "AirForce", were the pilots also AirForce or Boeing?

That’s a good question. The tow crew appeared to be in USAF garb however Boeing does supply training pilots for all new aircraft operators. 

If this was a pair of USAF pilots and they did that in the heat of battle I’d have to give them full marks for execution and mission accomplished. The issue here is that tanker still looks like an airliner and stabilized approach criteria is a huge deal these days with most airlines. It would have been a go-around or a working lunch with the Chief Pilot 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/17/2019 at 11:52 AM, blues deville said:

Fun to fly but that approach and landing wasn’t airshow worthy. Boeing doesn’t need anymore help with aircraft sales.

1. Overshot the turn to final. 

2. Touched down hard off the the centerline 

3. Excessive braking only to power up again exiting.

Other than that it was perfect. ?

Any landing that is discussed afterward in the mess is "perfect" :icon_jook:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe there was an issue with the aircraft and they needed to get her on the ground quick.  Not sure they would publicize that at the PAris Air Show.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, boestar said:

Maybe there was an issue with the aircraft and they needed to get her on the ground quick.  Not sure they would publicize that at the PAris Air Show.

 

Apparently the story is it was a Lt.-Col. from a US base in Germany where the aircraft was based. Perhaps someone more current should have flown the arrival?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, blues deville said:

Apparently the story is it was an Lt.-Col. from a US base in Germany where the aircraft was based. Perhaps someone more current should have flown the arrival?

The existence of the USAF's fleet of operational MiGs came to be public knowledge when a Lt. General took a MiG-23 for a joyride and promptly crashed it. The death of a Lt. General was pretty hard to cover-up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not the first time a senior officer has stretched the SOPs or taken a ”can do” attitude to an extreme conclusion:

On Friday, 24 June 1994, a United States Air Force (USAF) Boeing B-52 Stratofortress crashed at Fairchild Air Force BaseWashingtonUnited States,[1] after its pilot, Lieutenant Colonel Arthur "Bud" Holland, maneuvered the bomber beyond its operational limits and lost control. The B-52 stalled, fell to the ground and exploded, killing Holland and the three other field-grade officers on board the aircraft. In addition, one person on the ground suffered injuries during the accident, but survived. The crash was captured on video and was shown repeatedly on news broadcasts throughout the world.[2][3]

1994 Fairchild Air Force Base
B-52 crash
FairchildB52Crash.jpg
The B-52, a fraction of a second before it crashed. Co-pilot McGeehan's escape hatch, jettisoned during his attempt to eject, is visible near the tip of the vertical stabilizer.
Accident
Date 24 June 1994
Summary Pilot error lead to stall
Site Fairchild Air Force BaseWashington, U.S. 
47.6105°N 117.6505°W
Aircraft
Aircraft type B-52H Stratofortress
Aircraft name Czar 52
Operator United States Air Force
Registration  
Passengers 0
Crew 4
Fatalities 4
Injuries (on ground)
Survivors  

The subsequent investigation concluded that the crash was attributable primarily to three factors: Holland's personality and behavior; USAF leaders' delayed or inadequate reactions to earlier incidents involving Holland; and the sequence of events during the aircraft's final flight. The crash is now used in military and civilian aviation environments as a case study in teaching crew resource management. It is also often used by the U.S. Armed Forces during aviation safety training as an example of the importance of complying with safety regulations and correcting the behavior of anyone who violates safety procedures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...