blues deville Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Fuselage looks broken in two places. https://www.thechronicleherald.ca/news/local/cargo-plane-goes-off-runway-at-halifax-stanfield-airport-257275/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sky_Lease_Cargo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kip Powick Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Let's face it the Halifax airport does not like 747 s.. Glad no one was hurt (CTV news) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moon The Loon Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Where is the landing gear??????? Dollars to donuts: in the wheel wells. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vsplat Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 I see the localiser antenna is toast. Going to be a very interesting sked in there the next while.... Vs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 The winds at the time were 230 at 11 G 18. Up on Avherald now and a picture of where the thing ended up indicates they landed on 15. Is 24 closed over night? The landing gear was probably stripped off like the engines as they went down the hill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudder Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 What is landing distance required/dry runway for an empty 747-400? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 49 minutes ago, Warren said: The winds at the time were 230 at 11 G 18. Up on Avherald now and a picture of where the thing ended up indicates they landed on 15. Is 24 closed over night? The landing gear was probably stripped off like the engines as they went down the hill Update with better pics. Cargo plane goes off runway on landing in Halifax Cargo plane goes of runway in Halifax story link with video https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/cargo-plane-goes-off-runway-on-landing-in-halifax-1.4166611 A cargo plane went off the runway while landing at Halifax Stanfield International Airport, sending five crew members to hospital. CTVNews.ca StaffPublished Wednesday, November 7, 2018 6:01AM EST Last Updated Wednesday, November 7, 2018 9:45AM EST A 747 cargo plane skidded off a runway while landing at Halifax Stanfield International Airport early Wednesday, leaving a trail of debris and sending four crew members to hospital, according to the airport’s official Twitter account. The runway where the incident took place is closed until a safety review is conducted by officials, airport spokeswoman Theresa Rath Spicer told CTV’s Your Morning on Wednesday. But the airport’s main runway has been re-opened on a limited basis — the airport had activated its emergency operations centre which meant temporarily suspending all flights coming in or out of the airport. Photos A SkyLease Cargo plane skidded off a runway at Halifax Stanfield International Airport and stopped near a road early on Nov. 7, 2018. (Andrew Vaughan / CANADIAN PRESS) A SkyLease Cargo plane skidded off a runway at Halifax Stanfield International Airport and stopped near a road early on Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018. (Andrew Vaughan / CANADIAN PRESS) Spicer said, after the SkyLease Cargo plane skidded off Runway 14-32 just after 5 a.m., the crew members on board Flight KKE 4854 were taken to hospital with minor injuries. It is not yet clear what caused the incident, she added. Flights are expected to be “significantly impacted” by the incident and Spicer urged passengers to check with their airlines for specific delays or changes to their flights. Officials said the flight had been travelling from Chicago to Halifax before the incident occurred, CTV Atlantic’s Natasha Pace reported Wednesday. As part of the airport’s emergency procedures, RCMP, local police, Halifax fire services and medical response teams were called in. Citing privacy concerns, Emergency Health Services spokesman Remo Zaccagna wouldn’t comment on the precise nature of the injuries, but said two ambulances were sent to the airport along with a supervisory unit. Hours after the incident, the plane was still sitting on a slight incline far off the runway and within about 50 metres of a fence that marks the perimeter of the airport boundary. The landing gear wasn’t visible, the nose of the white aircraft had sustained moderate damage and the underside of the plane appeared to be cracked and heavily damaged. Two of the engines also appeared to be heavily damaged with the two other engines completely sheared off. District chief Gord West said the Halifax fire department had assisted the airport's fire unit and confirmed there was no fire resulting from the crash. He added crews had sprayed the aircraft with foam. In August, Stanfield airport announced SkyLease Cargo was operating two flights a week for First Catch, a Chinese-owned seafood freight forwarding company. It said SkyLease's 747-400 aircraft had the capacity to carry up to 120 tonnes of Nova Scotia seafood to China. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boestar Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 just attempted that approach with this mornings weather loaded in a 747-400. it was a bit nasty. now I am not a 747 pilot by any means but it was gusty for sure. BTW I failed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Previous Next Halifax News & Info @haligonia 4h4 hours ago BREAKING : Airport confirming that their Emergency Operations Centre has been activated in response to a 747 cargo aircraft that went off the end of Rwy 32 earlier this morning upon landing. 5 people on board, no reported injuries at this time.pic.twitter.com/wRIcRo9urh 6 replies 50 retweets 33 likes 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boestar Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 22 minutes ago, boestar said: just attempted that approach with this mornings weather loaded in a 747-400. it was a bit nasty. now I am not a 747 pilot by any means but it was gusty for sure. BTW I failed 3rd times a charm...made it stick but used the entire length.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMP Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 ATC tried to raise the red flag with a subtle wind update on final. Been on that approach many times with a strong tailwind on approach that doesn’t want to give up, never ever seems to transition to the surface winds until you’re very low. The surface wind in this case was a slight quartering tail wind. I’m not saying this overrun is due to the wind, could’ve been an equipment failure, could have been anything. ILS 23 U/S & now ILS 14 as well, leaving Halifax with its only useable approach with any wind that doesn’t favour 05 a NPA with raised minimums to a displaced threshold for the moment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ex 9A Guy Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 2 hours ago, Warren said: The winds at the time were 230 at 11 G 18. Up on Avherald now and a picture of where the thing ended up indicates they landed on 15. Is 24 closed over night? The landing gear was probably stripped off like the engines as they went down the hill They did land on 14, runway 23 ILS and CAT2 have been OTS for months. Strong x-wind landings on 14 with winds favouring 23 have been the norm in YHZ all summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudder Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 CYHZ approach/airport facilities clearly substandard for an airport with the type of weather routinely experienced locally. Guess that AC 624 did not get anyone’s attention, including NAV CAN. This does not absolve the pilots in that accident or the 747 accident of responsibility for safe operation of the aircraft, but these both will have the common theme of lack of available precision approach guidance on most suitable runway for landing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMP Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 260 16G21 Mag on final and TWR Confirms “14 still is acceptable?” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blues deville Posted November 7, 2018 Author Share Posted November 7, 2018 I’ve done that route a few times. ANC-ORD-YHZ-ANC. Sometimes a layover in ORD. No matter what by the time you’re in YHZ your body is somewhere else. Not sure why runway 23 wasn’t available. The cargo ramp is nicely located at the north end of 05. Easiest route to pick up a load of lobsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kip Powick Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Are the crustaceans alive or deceased in the boxes?? I am guessing alive because when I was running the HFX RCC, the good guys over at the Rescue Unit in Gander sent me a brand new silver garbage can full of lobsters, (alive), for my wedding anniversary " she" wasn't happy that they were alive so I did the cooking and had the neighbours over for a treat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AIP Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 38 minutes ago, rudder said: CYHZ approach/airport facilities clearly substandard for an airport with the type of weather routinely experienced locally. Guess that AC 624 did not get anyone’s attention, including NAV CAN. This does not absolve the pilots in that accident or the 747 accident of responsibility for safe operation of the aircraft, but these both will have the common theme of lack of available precision approach guidance on most suitable runway for landing. Substandard is being kind. bordering on negligent. With some of the countries poorest weather at times this is unacceptable. How is the makeover of the Tim Hortons and the lobster shop coming along though ??? (SARCASM INTENDED). You are 100% correct on the "noise" from AC624, and now this. Two accidents (thankfully with no loss of life), possibly prevented with proper and operational equipment at the airport. Is it really going to take a mass casualty event for things to change ???? Won't be long before YVR has issues with no ILS 08L either, the fog is a coming . . . . . . . . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blues deville Posted November 7, 2018 Author Share Posted November 7, 2018 On 11/7/2018 at 12:49 PM, Kip Powick said: Are the crustaceans alive or deceased in the boxes?? There was a cargo deck temp selection of course but I think these boxes (full 777 load) were all packed with ice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kip Powick Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Thx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blues deville Posted November 7, 2018 Author Share Posted November 7, 2018 3 hours ago, SMP said: 260 16G21 Mag on final and TWR Confirms “14 still is acceptable?” So they accepted the only ILS approach functioning with a quartering tail wind? Rwy 14 Localizer antenna now appears to be toast. By my count that means no ILS approaches available in YHZ. Perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moon The Loon Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 I've seen some other photos. Still no evidence of landing gear. I can't imagine how an overrun like this would take out all (at least 3, possibly 4) main , body and nose landing gears. Additionally, from the pix above, it also doesn't seem to have full landing flap extended. Anybody else see this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kip Powick Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 1 hour ago, Moon The Loon said: I've seen some other photos. Still no evidence of landing gear. I can't imagine how an overrun like this would take out all (at least 3, possibly 4) main , body and nose landing gears. Additionally, from the pix above, it also doesn't seem to have full landing flap extended. Anybody else see this? TSB, at a Press conference, said all gear collapsed during the overrun. Flaps??? I don't know the landing flap config, not certain if they are in full flap or not. Perhaps when the crew saw that they were going to go past the end, they selected flaps up to increase weight on the gear in hopes of stopping faster......just a WAG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blues deville Posted November 10, 2018 Author Share Posted November 10, 2018 The 747-400 has an inboard LE retraction system when reverse thrust is used. Looks like it didn’t extend again from the photos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southshore Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 I must be missing something here. Wind was M260 16G21. By any measure that is a small headwind on Rw23. Where is this quartering tailwind chit chat coming from? If a light wind (for here) with a massive 5 kt gust is a problem, I have a tip for ya - don't come here...ever. There is another issue at play here which will come to light soon enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeker Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 16 minutes ago, Southshore said: I must be missing something here. Wind was M260 16G21. By any measure that is a small headwind on Rw23. Where is this quartering tailwind chit chat coming from? If a light wind (for here) with a massive 5 kt gust is a problem, I have a tip for ya - don't come here...ever. There is another issue at play here which will come to light soon enough. Well, it was a quartering TW for runway 14. The crew decided that a slight quartering TW on the shorter, wet, runway with an ILS was a better option than dealing with an RNAV approach to a displaced threshold on the longer, into wind runway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.