Guest Posted August 22, 2018 Share Posted August 22, 2018 Boeing Issues Notice For 777 Operators Following Etihad Incident Boeing Issues Notice For 777 Operators Following Etihad Incident LONDON – Boeing has issued a notice to all 777 customers after the Australian Transportation Safety Board (ATSB) concluded its report on an incident involving an Etihad 777-300(ER) (A6-ETR) back... August 22 11:182018 Print This Article by James Field LONDON – Boeing has issued a notice to all 777 customers after the Australian Transportation Safety Board (ATSB) concluded its report on an incident involving an Etihad 777-300(ER) (A6-ETR) back in October 2017. The flight in question took place on October 14, 2017, between Abu Dhabi and Sydney. At 04:07LT, while the aircraft was in-flight at cruising altitude, the crew noticed burning smells coming from an air vent. Photo: John Taggart According to the report, the Pilots rapidly reacted to a FIRE CARGO FWD warning light in the flight deck’s annunciator panel. Once the pilots determined the problem, the non-normal checklists were implemented and the aircraft began it’s diversion to Adelaide Airport. By 04:55LT, the aircraft landed uneventfully, with emergency services not noticing any external fires coming out from the aircraft. Location of the damage in the FWD Cargo hold. Photo: ATSB. After the plane had landed, the forward cargo compartment was emptied and maintenance engineers were sent in to take a look. Within minutes, they found a small quantity of soot in the ceiling of the cargo area. The areas of where the soot was identified were then removed, finding heat damage and a chafed 115-volt electrical wire in the wiring compartment. Once the damage was found, they implemented a temporary fix onto the cargo bin before departed on a ferry flight back to Abu Dhabi, where the more permanent repairs took place. A6-ETR is still operational to this date. The heat damage and soot in photographical form. Photo: ATSB. When consulted with Boeing, the manufacturer determined that the wiring loom, labeled as W5279, was incorrectly fitted at the time when the aircraft was built in 2013. The incorrection in fitting meant that the screws chafed the wires and shorted the circuits. This is not an unknown issue to Boeing. Reportedly, there have been other four incidents in the cargo bay of other 777s. This was, however, the first time that the warning lights in the flight deck had been displayed. Thankfully, all 349 passengers and 16 members were deplaned with no harm. Had the warning messages not shown up, this incident could have turned into a catastrophe. “Boeing has received reports of five separate in-service events where a ceiling liner screw in the forward cargo compartment was found in contact with a wire bundle, resulting in a short to ground that damaged cargo ceiling standoffs, the wire bundle, and the floor beam in some cases,” said the manufacturer in a statement. A6-ETR seen here on approach into Munich back in March 2018. Photo: Thomas Vatany. “Boeing Engineering performed an investigation of all cargo ceiling wire bundle installation engineering drawings. Boeing will add additional spacing as a precaution when wire bundles are in close proximity to ceiling liner screws.” A6-ETR is a predominantly young aircraft, delivered to Etihad in November 2013. At the time of the incident, the aircraft had flown 2,284 cycles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boestar Posted August 22, 2018 Share Posted August 22, 2018 if they had 5 previous incidents that were identified with a common issue then Boeing should have put out a Service Bulleting to inspect and correct any issues in a short time frame. this could be done on an overnight. Why wait until an incident turns the lights on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest1 Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Potential rivet inspection for all 777s Two days ago, on April 9th, the FAA submitted a proposed airworthiness directive relating to all active examples of Boeing’s widespread 777 family. For now, the proposal is amid a comment period. It explained its proposition by stating that: “This proposed AD was prompted by a report that an operator found solid rivets with missing heads at the left buttock line 25 on the sloping pressure deck web. This proposed AD would require doing a detailed inspection of the left and right side sloping pressure deck at certain stations for any damaged solid rivets, and applicable on-condition actions.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.