Sign in to follow this  
Malcolm

Reality 2018

Recommended Posts

On 11/8/2018 at 1:25 PM, DEFCON said:

But how do you get the message across to lefties that they're the actual fascists?

 

I think you have to start with their view of racism, it strikes me that is the point of origin (appropriately called POO in army circles)... maybe this guy can help:

 

 

Edited by Wolfhunter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The left considers any thought given toward demographics and integration as being racist. They believe that everyone wants what they want and everyone shares their national vision and personal aspirations. There’s a remarkable and largely missed irony here; this very notion, in and of itself, is largely responsible for the foreign policy failures that have lead us to this situation in the first place. 

Edited by Wolfhunter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Male Teacher Punished For Refusing To Watch Trans Student Change In The Locker Room

Klavan cited a Federalist article by Joy Pullmann describing a female-to-male student whose coach refused to watch her change in the locker room. As punishment, he was transferred to another school for not "fulfilling his duty." Here's an excerpt from Pullmann's report:

With a “gag order,” school administrators forbade teachers from talking about the change, and ordered a male P.E. teacher to supervise the potentially undressed girl in the Chasco Middle School locker room, the letter says. When he refused to “knowingly place himself in a position to observe a minor female in the nude or otherwise in a state of undress,” administrators told him “he will be transferred to another school as discipline for ‘not doing your job in the locker room.'”

"So this is a girl who thinks she’s a boy, they let her in the boys locker room, and the first time she walked in she caught the boys, literally, with their pants down," Klavan explained. "They were embarrassed, right? They didn’t like it. So the school put a gag order, forbidding teachers from talking about the change."

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/38381/klavan-male-teacher-punished-refusing-watch-trans-jacob-airey

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like the Romans before them, the ongoing pursuit of meaningless self indulgent causes leaves the people of the West blind to reality and completely oblivious to the coming collapse of their society.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Next headline to read:

Male Teacher Punished For Watching Trans Student Change In The Locker Room.

Personally, I would consider having women who think they're gay men in the men's locker room one of the few byproducts of Roman madness I could get onboard with... thank you! 

Edited by Wolfhunter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Jaydee said:

Male Teacher Punished For Refusing To Watch Trans Student Change In The Locker Room

Klavan cited a Federalist article by Joy Pullmann describing a female-to-male student whose coach refused to watch her change in the locker room. As punishment, he was transferred to another school for not "fulfilling his duty." Here's an excerpt from Pullmann's report:

With a “gag order,” school administrators forbade teachers from talking about the change, and ordered a male P.E. teacher to supervise the potentially undressed girl in the Chasco Middle School locker room, the letter says. When he refused to “knowingly place himself in a position to observe a minor female in the nude or otherwise in a state of undress,” administrators told him “he will be transferred to another school as discipline for ‘not doing your job in the locker room.'”

"So this is a girl who thinks she’s a boy, they let her in the boys locker room, and the first time she walked in she caught the boys, literally, with their pants down," Klavan explained. "They were embarrassed, right? They didn’t like it. So the school put a gag order, forbidding teachers from talking about the change."

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/38381/klavan-male-teacher-punished-refusing-watch-trans-jacob-airey

 

 

Gad Saad on this story:

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Political Correctness: The Enemy of Free Speech

When a person is politically correct, they avoid “language or behavior that any particular group of people might feel is unkind or offensive.” While political correctness can be reasonable in opposing offensive words, it becomes the enemy of free speech when it does not allow for ideological diversity.

Politically correctness is rooted in binary thinking that divides society into groups: oppressor vs oppressed, advantaged vs disadvantaged, privileged vs underprivileged, and so on. When the world is viewed through this binary lens, any speech that portrays an “oppressed” group in a negative light is considered a violation. The person with a politically “incorrect” viewpoint is seen as taking the side of the “oppressor.”

To those who are politically correct, oppressor groups often include white people, white males, the rich, conservatives, and pro-life Christians. Free speech is welcomed when these groups are criticized. However, any criticism of an oppressed group (or member of that group) is not tolerated, even if it is true. Disagreement is conflated with hatred.

Political correctness is reasonable when it treats minority groups with dignity and respect. On both sides of the political spectrum, there is agreement that certain words used in the past are no longer appropriate today. For instance, we no longer call an indigenous person an “Indian”, a mentally-ill person a “lunatic” or a disabled person a “cripple.”

Political correctness is also reasonable in opposing racist language. Roseanne Barr, in a racist tweet, compared Valerie Jarrett, an African-American woman, to the offspring of an ape. Barr may have been exercising her right to free speech, but people also have the right to respond to her speech. No one should tolerate racist insults.

The problem with political correctness is not in opposing offensive words, but rather in trying to silence different worldviews, especially Christian and conservative beliefs. When political correctness seeks ideological conformity, it becomes a form of tyranny.

Its primary strategy to achieve conformity is through public shaming. For example, if someone criticizes the teachings of Islam, they are labelled an Islamophobe or a racist. The shame of being stigmatized pressures many people into silence, resulting in politically correct viewpoints becoming the norm in public discourse.

A second tactic of political correctness to silence other viewpoints is by being triggered.  In many American Universities, certain beliefs that “trigger” a negative emotional response are considered microaggressions. At the University of Minnesota, saying “I believe the most qualified person should get the job” is considered an act of aggression to a non-white person. To the political correct mind, ideas that trigger negative emotions must be eliminated.

A final tactic of political correctness to restrict free speech is protesting. In the United States, when a conservative speaker is invited to a University, students have often protested until the speaker is disinvited. Rather than allowing for public debate and discussion, the politically correct “mob” tries to silence anyone they disagree with.

Whether politically correct or incorrect, left wing or right wing, no one has a monopoly on the truth. Unfortunately, those who are politically correct can be so convinced their point of view is right that they feel morally justified in silencing other views by any means possible.

The only way to discover the truth is to consider all sides of an issue: both left and right. However, when political correctness succeeds in silencing opposing viewpoints, the truth can often be lost. People who possess the truth are deprived of the right to speak, and others are deprived of the right to hear.

For good or ill, political correctness is a means of social control. In George Orwell’s novel, 1984, the state controls how people think through Newspeak: the elimination of words that are considered harmful. Similarly, political correctness controls how people think by eliminating both words and ideas from public discourse. Hence, it is a means of thought control.

The chief error of political correctness is that if an idea is offensive to someone, it must be wrong. In reality, when people believe something that is false, the truth can sometimes offend them. The only way to combat political correctness is by exercising one’s right to free speech. In the marketplace of ideas, the truth—if it is not silenced—will eventually defeat falsehood.

https://www.thepostmillennial.com/political-correctness-the-enemy-of-free-speech/

 

 

 

 

254F3290-68A2-4425-BABE-E31FDAF83FFE.jpeg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"The shame of being stigmatized pressures many people into silence, resulting in politically correct viewpoints becoming the norm in public discourse."

You don't have to go too far to see how the perceived need to remain politically correct affects free and open discussion; the policy is alive & well here on this site.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, DEFCON said:

"The shame of being stigmatized pressures many people into silence, resulting in politically correct viewpoints becoming the norm in public discourse."

You don't have to go too far to see how the perceived need to remain politically correct affects free and open discussion; the policy is alive & well here on this site.

 

Which is clearly Indicated by the few posters who are willing to contribute to this forum. Lots of people read the postings as indicated by the number of views but 99% are unwilling to add to the conversation because they are afraid people may not “like” them. I applaud the few trying to move the conversations forward compared to the majority who deny the fact these subjects even exist.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Jaydee said:

Which is clearly Indicated by the few posters who are willing to contribute to this forum. Lots of people read the postings as indicated by the number of views but 99% are unwilling to add to the conversation because they are afraid people may not “like” them. I applaud the few trying to move the conversations forward compared to the majority who deny the fact these subjects even exist.

Hey!  Stop being so racist!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving' Is Now Racist

 

Another holiday classic has been slapped with the label "racist" by SJWs for supposedly marginalizing the token black character: "A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving."

People on social media have expressed outrage over the fact that the lone black character Franklin in "A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving" appears seated differently juxtaposed to the white characters during the famous dinner scene where Charlie Brown serves popcorn and toast to his hungry guests instead of turkey and stuffing. From The Hill:

The scene in question has four characters from Charles M. Schulz’s iconic "Peanuts" cartoon — Sally, Charlie Brown, Peppermint Patty and dog Snoopy — sitting on one side of a makeshift outdoor table for Thanksgiving dinner, with Marcie at one end of the table and Linus at the head.

The cartoon's lone black character, Franklin, is on his own side of the table seated on a lawn chair.

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/38657/charlie-brown-thanksgiving-now-racist-paul-bois

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weep for Society ! 😪

Mom Says 6-Year-Old Son Is Transgender. Dad Disagrees. Now He Might Lose His Son.

A Texas father is fighting for his son in court after pushing back on his ex-wife's claim that their six-year-old is a transgender girl.

According to court documents, the young boy only dresses as a girl when he's with his mother, who has enrolled him in first-grade as a female named "Luna." The father, however, contends that his son consistently chooses to wear boy's clothes, "violently refuses to wear girl’s clothes at my home," and identifies as a boy when he is with him.

The Federalist reports that the mother has accused the father of child abuse in their divorce proceedings "for not affirming James as transgender" and is looking to strip the dad of his parental rights. "She is also seeking to require him to pay for the child’s visits to a transgender-affirming therapist and transgender medical alterations, which may include hormonal sterilization starting at age eight," the report adds.

The father has been legally barred from speaking to his child about sexuality and gender from a scientific or religious perspective and from dressing his son in boys' clothes; instead, he has to offer both girls' and boys' outfits. The boy consistently refuses to wear dresses, according to the father.

The boy was diagnosed with gender dysphoria by a gender transition therapist the mother, a pediatrician, chose for her son to see. According to the therapist's notes, the boy chose to identify as a girl when he was in sessions alone with his mother; alternatively, he chose to identify as a boy when he was in sessions alone with his father. The Federalist reports:

[A] dossier filed with the Dallas court says that, under the skilled eyes of the therapist, the child was presented two pieces of paper, one with the word “James” and one with the word “Luna,” and asked to pick the name he preferred. When the appointment only included his mother, James selected Luna, the name and gender he uses at his mother’s home and in his first-grade classroom. When the appointment was only with his father, however, James pointed to the boy name James, not the girl name.

 

Moreover, the father has collected testimony from parents of his son's friends and a church leader who say they have only seen the six-year-old identify as a male.

The boy's pastor, Christ Church Carrollton Bill Lovell, said, "Based on the three occasions I’ve spent time with him, I’d say he acts and looks unmistakably like a healthy six-year-old boy. ... I am praying for [him], an average six-year-old boy, a sweet-natured, intelligent, lovable and at this point particularly vulnerable young man, caught up in a titanic clash of worldviews."

"His mother came to pick up the boys to take them to [his brother’s] soccer game," recalled Sarah Scott, a family friend and mother of three sons who are close with the boy. "[He] hugged his dad and said, 'Love you.' He refused to go to the soccer game as a girl with mom and stayed with dad. That evening they came to our house."

 

Needless to say, the gender dysphoria diagnosis is being contested by the boy's dad.

Walt Heyer, author of Trans Life Survivors and former transgender female, warns that the potential diagnosis could ruin the boy's life, similar to what he went through after he was secretly cross-dressed by this grandmother for two-and-a-half years as a young boy.

"The diagnosis is critical, because labeling a child with gender dysphoria can trigger a series of physical and mental consequences for the child and has legal ramifications in the ongoing custody case. Get it wrong," Heyer writes at The Federalist, the boy's "life is irrevocably harmed."

The boy's "precious young life hinges purely on the diagnosis of gender dysphoria by a therapist who wraps herself in rainbow colors, affirms the diagnosis of gender dysphoria, and dismisses evidence to the contrary," argues Heyer. "Remove the 'rainbow' from [the] diagnosis, and it crumbles under the weight of the criteria for the diagnosis of gender dysphoria."

The author warned, "If we do not save [the boy] from a misdiagnosis, his next step is chemical castration at age eight, only two years away."

 

The family fighting to save the boy from the potential misdiagnosis has set up a website called "Save James."

To read the full report, click here.

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/38728/mom-says-6-year-old-son-transgender-dad-disagrees-amanda-prestigiacomo

 

 

 

 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All it takes is one idiot of a parent and a handful of modern age mentally deficient so-called professionals to completely destroy a kids life.

And then when as a teenager the kid is so messed up he grabs a gun and shoots a pile of people, the same kind of genius will blame the gun???

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this