Sign in to follow this  
deicer

Why You Need Trusted News Sources

Recommended Posts

While it can't be denied about the comments on twitter, and the lawyers investigation, having Daddy's money pay for it all just makes them good candidates for republican senator or supreme court judge....

https://www.dailydot.com/irl/covington-boys-video

Click the hotlinks to see the videos.

And it also helps to hire top notch spin masters...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jan/23/how-conservative-media-transformed-the-covington-catholic-students-from-pariahs-to-heroes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

The Fox is now in charge of the hen house. Stand by for the slaughter !

8F6FBF24-615F-4CD9-8A14-D62F8D4615D3.jpeg

Edited by Jaydee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting contrast in Headlines on the same story.

From Global

February 1, 2019 9:37 am

Small majority of Canadians disapprove of Trudeau’s handling of China relations

head-e1366223352543.jpg?quality=60&strip By Andrew Russell National Online Journalist, Investigative  Global News
 
From the National Post
Majority of Canadians think Trudeau is doing bad job handling tense relations with China: poll
 
From the Epoch Times
Survey Shows Canadians Unsatisfied With Trudeau’s Handling of China Tensions
 
Lastly from the Toronto Sun
LILLEY: Trudeau under fire for messing up relations with China
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmmmmm

CBC should be embracing Netflix

CBC head needs to chill, embrace binge-watching

  • Calgary Herald
  • 2 Feb 2019
  • CHRIS SELLEY
img?regionKey=rqiEBpiRyzRkBQVERmYE6Q%3d%3dSEAN KILPATRICK / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES Catherine Tait, president and CEO of CBC/Radio-Canada, gave a speech this week comparing Netflix’s presence in Canada to the “cultural imperialism” of French Africa.

CBC CEO Catherine Tait said something truly insane on Thursday, and we owe her a debt of gratitude. It’s so rare that Canadians reach consensus on matters pertaining to Mother Corp. With Hockey Night in Canada now a Rogers production, there’s nothing left at CBC that really unites (anglophone) Canadians around their wireless sets — and even then, we were bitterly divided over the question of Don Cherry.

We can all agree, however, that Tait’s comments at a TV industry conference in Ottawa were bananas. “I was thinking of the British Empire and how if … you were the viceroy of India you would feel that you were doing only good for the people of India,” she said. “Or similarly, if you were in French Africa, you would think, ‘I’m educating them, I’m bringing their resources to the world, and I’m helping them.’ There was a time where cultural imperialism was absolutely accepted.”

No word of a lie, she was talking about Netflix’s presence in Canada.

Tait conceded that “it is probably the most exciting time in terms of screened entertainment.” But what horrors might lie ahead? “What happens after imperialism and the damage that can do to local communities?” she asked. “Let us be mindful of how it is we as Canadians respond to global companies coming into our country.”

One struggles to imagine how anyone would arrive at the connection, let alone think it wise to articulate it in public. It seems foolish even to dignify it with a critique, but it’s particularly striking that subscribing to Netflix is a voluntary action — unlike, say, the French invasion of Algeria. Or getting mowed down by British soldiers. Or contributing to CBC’s annual subsidy.

It’s ridiculous and offensive on any number of levels. But it also bespeaks someone in a very important position who seems to be almost psychedelically out of touch with the corporation and the public she is supposed to work for.

To the vast majority of Canadians, including those who support the CBC, the idea that Netflix represents any kind of threat — and should thus be taxed or forced to carry minimum amounts of Canadian content or otherwise regulated, as various groups urge — will just seem irretrievably bizarre. Whether or not it’s a good idea, CanCon only works in a restricted market where channels broadcast specific things at specific times. Back in the day you might just find yourself bored enough to watch or listen to something you didn’t really want to, and it might just be Canadian.

No one watches anything on Netflix that they don’t want to — no one single, anyway — so there’s no earthly reason to put stuff there if people don’t want it. The irony, though, is that there’s a ton of Canadian content on Netflix, precisely because people want to watch it. And as University of Ottawa professor Michael Geist explained in a blog post on Friday, Netflix makes it very easy to find: Not only are there direct links to Canadian TV shows and films, but it algorithmically detects a user’s preference for CanCon and recommends other titles.

Goodness, just look at all the Canuck shows: Baroness Von Sketch Show, Workin’ Moms, Mr. D, Kim’s Convenience, Schitt’s Creek, Intelligence … hang on a tic, those are all CBC shows! How did those imperialist Silicon Valley pigdogs get their filthy hands on it? Because as more and more Canadians cut the cord, Netflix is a perfectly logical place for CBC and the production companies it works with to showcase their work — not just to Canada but to the world. In short, there doesn’t seem to be any problem or threat here at all, to anyone — just success, and the opportunity for more.

If Tait’s in search of real problems at CBC, she needn’t struggle to find them. Perhaps most notably, the TV news offerings are basically indistinguishable from the commercial broadcasters’ — so what’s the point of them? Indeed, as I’ve argued before, CBC is long overdue for a comprehensive mandate review, and there is no time like the present.

The Liberals in Ottawa are obsessed with media these days, to the point that they want to dole out hundreds of millions of dollars to struggling news organizations. Whatever you think of that idea, it makes no sense at all without first examining in detail how the CBC colossus fits into that marketplace. If the Liberals want a stronger public broadcaster, as they say, then they should launch a comprehensive review of everything it does and how it does it — especially since senior management seems unable to distinguish success from failure and opportunity from a 19th-century French military campaign.

THE IRONY, THOUGH, IS THAT THERE’S A TON OF CANADIAN CONTENT ON NETFLIX.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have a little CBC game my wife and I play in the car.

The notion is that CBC radio never (ever) is transmitting anything an average person would want to listen to when you tune into it.

I say are you ready for CBC? Then she says yup. I press the station preset we listen for 10 seconds and burst out laughing. I don't remember it ever failing to amuse. I know.... country folks eh?

Edited by Wolfhunter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually there are several CBC radio programs I anticipate and listen to regularly;  Quirks and Quarks, White Coat/Black Art, This is That, Vinyl Cafe and really like Under the Influence.  The news and midday leftist programming and interviews not so much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As for the trusted nature of statistics and media reporting.... a Leger pole conducted for a Quebec gun control group concluded that 78% of Quebecers were in favour of the provincial long gun registry. 

With the registration deadline come and gone, more than 75% of the long guns remain unregistered and individual towns (mostly rural) are passing resolutions against the initiative. In short, with JT at the helm, and the press bought and paid for, polls are of no more value to Canadians than the media is. 

Meanwhile in the US, Liberal media defend the ridiculous notion that physical barriers are useless. There may be good reasons for not building a wall.... or building one in high traffic areas only or other approaches that have merit. But, if your position is that physical barriers don't work and therefore should not be used, I just stop reading. Look around at any secure location you can find, you will likely see a fence as part (yes part) of the security mix. In some cases, the fence/wall integrity is so tight that you could argue internal monitoring and alarms are useless because they have never been needed.  

Edited by Wolfhunter
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Infowars, and Alex Jones,  gets slammed as being completely irrational and beyond the lunatic fringe but the story below is more succinct and verifiably true than anything in the MSM.

Media whipped up fake race-baiting narrative over tragic murder

The investigation into the shooting of a 7-year-old girl in Houston, Texas that civil rights activists and left-wing media sites asserted was a white supremacist hate crime took an unexpected turn when it was revealed that the gunman was a 24-year-old black man.

https://www.infowars.com/white-supremacist-shooting-of-7-year-old-black-girl-gunman-turns-out-to-be-black/

Edited by seeker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this