Personal Drones

[DEFCON]

http://www.flixxy.com/the-incr edible-flyboard-air.htm

 

[Kip Powick]

If you thought skateboard and hover board operators spent time in the ER, wait until these become "legal".... 

[vanishing point]

FINALŁY an easy way to clean my gutters!  I can get rid of that archaic ladder.  

[deicer]

If he had dressed like this, then it would be over the top cool!

 

[Guest]

Maybe the first... Let us hope if the first, it is the last.

http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Boeing-737-Damaged-In-Possible-Drone-Collision-228298-1.html

 

Boeing 737 Damaged In Possible Drone Collision

• 
•  
• 
•  

• Text size:

   
  • A
  •  
  • A
  •  
  • A

•  
•  
•  
• inShare

By Elaine Kauh | January 6, 2017

RELATED ARTICLES

• Drunks in the Cockpit: A Problem?
• Citation Remains Missing; Helicopter Crashes Off L.A. Shore
• Report: A380 Cabin Crew 'Disoriented’ On Diverted Flight
• Handler Locked In RJ Cargo Bay

 

 

 

A Boeing 737 appears to have sustained damage after striking a drone during approach intoMozambique’s main airport on Thursday. It could be among the first confirmed collisions between an airliner and unmanned aircraft, but details were scarce regarding the type of drone and whether any witnesses on board saw it. LAM Mozambique Airlines, the nation’s flagship carrier, reported the incident occurred during the B737-700’s approach to the airport in Tete. The crew heard a “crash” that sounded like the aircraft struck an object, but proceeded with a normal landing. Eighty passengers were on board, the airline said.

Photos of the Boeing after an inspection on the ground show multiple gashes and cracks on the nose of the jet. While the crew thought initially there was a bird strike, the damage indicates the jet struck something else, as described in a USA Today report. Airline crews around the world have reported possible drone encounters in the past year, increasing concerns over unauthorized flights into busy airspace, but there hasn’t been confirmed evidence of a strike. In March 2016, the crew of a Lufthansa Airbus A380 reported seeing a drone near Los Angeles International Airport. The following month, reports of a British Airways A320 striking a drone were debunked as an investigation turned up no evidence of a drone, but possibly another small object such as a bag

[Guest]

Seems that the problem of drones is spreading. 

USAF Wants Authority To Down Drones After F-22 Near Miss

Jul 12, 2017Lara Seligman | Aerospace Daily & Defense Report

 

In early July, an F-22Raptor pilot coming in for a landing just barely avoided colliding with a small, commercial unmanned aerial system (UAS). That same week, a base security guard watched another tiny drone fly onto the complex and over the flight line before heading back out.

In neither case did the airman have the legal authority to shoot down or otherwise disable the drone.

As drone technology becomes cheaper and more commercially available, the U.S. Air Force is increasingly worried about the threats posed by small UAS such as quadcopters. But while the service is developing the tools to defend against these systems—from jamming their electronics to shooting them down—it lacks the legal authority to use them, says Gen. James Holmes, commander of Air Combat Command.

“Imagine a world where somebody flies a couple hundred of those, and flies one down the intake of one of my F-22s with just a small weapon,” Holmes said July 11 during an event on Capitol Hill. “I need the authorities to deal with that.”

Dealing with commercial drones near protected facilities is a complicated legal issue. The FAA is responsible for all U.S. airspace, and has already established no-fly zones over every U.S. military base so any drone flight there is illegal. But determining when it is OK for the military to disable or destroy UAS that wander into its facilities is still something of a gray area. Outside the Pentagon and FAA, multiple government agencies are involved, including the Department of Homeland Security and even the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which mandates that only government agencies can use jamming against drones.

In particular, the Air Force is concerned about UAS near its nuclear sites—an even more complex issue because the Department of Energy also has a stake.

“We will likely receive authorities to defend the nuclear installations first, and then we will try to work the other ones,” Holmes said. “We need to extend those authorities beyond the nuclear sites to protect our sophisticated assets that we rely on.”

For the FAA, the most immediate concern is UAS flying near busy commercial airports. The agency has tested several different detection systems at several airports, including a CACI International system that can identify both a UAS and its operator in the vicinity of airports.

Meanwhile, UAS in the wrong hands abroad present a different threat. Islamic State militants have begun arming commercial quadcopters with small munitions akin to grenades and deploying them against Iraqi security forces and civilians. The U.S. Army saw many instances of this tactic during the fight to retake Mosul.

Several firms are developing ways to deal with this threat, including Battelle’s “DroneDefender,” a handheld device that uses directed energy to disrupt adversary control of the drone. But this system has not been authorized by the FCC and cannot be sold commercially.