Guest Posted February 10, 2007 Share Posted February 10, 2007 here is another Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2007 Share Posted February 10, 2007 and yet another Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitch Cronin Posted February 10, 2007 Share Posted February 10, 2007 Yup, some stringers, some formers (or frames).... some skin... a static port right there to add complication... still.... a write off??? ... We've seen what looks just as bad fixed in a week and flying again... I guess a DC9 really isn't worth much.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AAS Posted February 10, 2007 Share Posted February 10, 2007 Its sitting up at the FedEx ramp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2007 Share Posted February 10, 2007 Yup, some stringers, some formers (or frames).... some skin... a static port right there to add complication... still.... a write off??? ... We've seen what looks just as bad fixed in a week and flying again... I guess a DC9 really isn't worth much.... You are correct, it will likely become a parts car so to speak. I put a great number of hours on this bird when we had it in YUL, sad way to see it go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conehead Posted February 11, 2007 Share Posted February 11, 2007 I think that deformation around the static port may affect the RVSM rating... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.