Seeker Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Globe and Mail article I don't mind if the ratio changes to 1 in 50 but I think at the smaller end it should remain the same. The example given is a Westjet 737 with 125 seats - this seating configuration should keep 1 in 40 in order to have two FAs at each end of the aircraft. On larger aircraft where the ratio change might result in having 5 FAs instead of 6 I don't see a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudder Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Looks like Pammy does not have as much influence in YOW as she thought. This battle was lost before she even sat down in front of the Standing Committee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canus Chinookus Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 I welcome it with open arms! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moeman Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 You welcome Pammy with open arms??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canus Chinookus Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 I could see how you'd get confused by me saying "it", but no, not her!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dropzone Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 Come on fellas....I've been fighting for one F/A per pilot for years...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp fa Posted May 12, 2006 Share Posted May 12, 2006 Come on fellas....I've been fighting for one F/A per pilot for years...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.