Donating Member
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


AAS last won the day on July 12

AAS had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

36 Excellent

1 Follower

About AAS

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

3,588 profile views
  1. AAS

    Air Service to Small Cities

    Why should my tax dollars be spent to support an airline route when it’s not viable for a bus?
  2. AAS

    Tarmac accident at YYZ

    Link to the TSB report http://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapports-reports/aviation/2018/a18o0002/a18o0002.asp
  3. The report from TSB http://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapports-reports/aviation/2018/a18o0002/a18o0002.asp
  4. AAS

    Memory Lane

  5. AAS

    Memory Lane

    YQG was a Nordair scheduled destination. That’s how we got ribs from the tunnel barbecue
  6. AAS

    Memory Lane

  7. AAS

    A380 Wake Turbulance

    About a year ago there was this encounter with wake turbulence. http://m.aviationweek.com/ebace-2017/german-challenger-totaled-after-a380-wake-turbulence
  8. https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/708781/frankfurt-airport-fire-germany-plane-flames-tow-truck-blaze
  9. The company I work for use to have random drug & alcohol testing. I consulted a laborer lawyer friend. He at that time told me that the random drug test could not give a level of impairment only that there was a trace of drugs. The case law involved Entrop VS Imperial Oil. “Random Drug and Alcohol Testing In Canada, differences in the law have emerged between random alcohol testing and random drug testing and between the unionized and non-unionized sectors as a result of the decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in Entrop v. Imperial Oil Ltd.3 ("Entrop") andImperial Oil Ltd. v. Communications, Energy & Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 9004 ("Imperial Oil"). In Entrop, the Court of Appeal was required to assess whether an Ontario Board of Inquiry had correctly interpreted the applicable human rights legislation when it decided that random alcohol and drug testing was discriminatory. The Court determined that the Board's decision regarding random alcohol testing was incorrect and overturned it, on the basis that random alcohol testing by way of breathalyser measures present impairment and produces immediate results without impinging on an employee's right to privacy. However, the Court went on to say that automatic termination as a result of a positive test result would likely be found to contravene human rights law if the need for accommodation had not first been explored. The Court in Entrop determined that random drug testing, however, even for employees in safety-sensitive positions, could not be justified and that the decision of the Board of Inquiry in this regard was correct. In Imperial Oil, the primary issue that a labour arbitrator was originally asked to consider was whether the employer's random, unannounced alcohol and drug testing policy was reasonable. The Arbitrator did not consider the issue of alcohol testing because the employer's practice in this regard had gone unchallenged by the union since 1992. However, the Arbitrator adopted the "Canadian model" regarding drug testing and found that random drug testing is not permissible since the methods of testing currently available, either urinalysis or buccal (oral) swabs, are highly intrusive and incapable of measuring present impairment in a timely way. The Arbitrator further concluded that such testing was not reasonably necessary to accomplish an employer's goals of maintaining safety or promoting deterrence of drug use. The Court of Appeal for Ontario eventually opted to defer to the Arbitrator in this regard and did not overturn his award. As a result of the decision in Imperial Oil, random drug testing can generally only be performed in the unionized context as part of a rehabilitative program for employees with a proven drug or alcohol dependency. Often such arrangements are imposed in lieu of termination of employment and are agreed upon by the employer, employee and union in the form of a "last chance" or "return to work" agreement. However, where a drug and alcohol policy requires automatic return to work testing in every case, it could be viewed as unreasonable and/or contrary to Canadian human rights law. Furthermore, in circumstances where there is no evidence of dependency or abuse, but only a positive drug test, it is unlikely that an employer can impose random, unannounced return to work testing” Should be fun to watch this play out.
  10. AAS

    Last Flight Video

    Three of them have a similar registration to the Australian one. C-FOGJ, C-FOGN, C-FOGT
  11. AAS

    Big Plane at YLW

    I always thought aircraft was the plural as well.
  12. A Sichuan Airlines Airbus A320-133 (B-6419) was damaged after one of the windshield in the cockpit separate from the aircraft. The flight took off from Chongqing Jiangbei International Airport, China at 22:27 UTC. The accident happened at 23:08 UTC, while the flight was cruising at FL321 over the city of Chengdu, China. The windshield on the right side of the cockpit was separated from the aircraft, causing an decompression of the aircraft.
  13. https://onemileatatime.boardingarea.com/2018/05/13/turkish-plane-tail-istanbul/ WoW