Malcolm

Members
  • Content count

    4,122
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

Malcolm last won the day on February 27

Malcolm had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

482 Excellent

About Malcolm

  • Rank
    Malcolm
  • Birthday

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

6,399 profile views
  1. Seems to me the Tulsa event was entirely racial.
  2. Just think if you were in Alberta (sunshine that is) Great Bear and Great Slave lake might give you a work out. Great Bear Lake, located in the Northwest Territories, is the largest lake located entirely inside Canadian borders. It is also the fourth largest in North America and the eighth largest in the world. Water flows out of the lake into the Great Bear River, then into the Mackenzie River. Other rivers connected to the lake include the Dease, Camsell and Johnny Hoe. Great Bear Lake is made up of five separate arms, each with their own names: Dease, McTavish, McVicar, Keith and Smith. Great Slave Lake is located in the Northwest Territories. It is the second largest lake entirely within Canadian borders, the fifth largest in North America, and the tenth largest in the world. With a maximum depth of 614 m, it is also North America’s deepest lake. Two arms, referred to as the North and East arms, extend from the lake. The name “Slave” derives from “Slavey” — a word sometimes applied to a major group of Dene people indigenous to the region. When earning money for his commercial licence, my father fished those lakes in the late 30's. The weather is fierce and the storms brew up very fast.
  3. We get 2 bills, one for Electricity and the other for Natural gas. As you can see the various non energy charges are quite creative. The example below does include the Carbon Levy.
  4. Kip: to your questions I will add, are you (deicer or Kasey) talking about racial violence?
  5. Jaydee, there was also some musing about removing the tax exemption on the sale of your primary dwelling that we presently enjoy. They have already closed a loophole (foreign ownership) which did make sense.
  6. Thanks, Seeker and Kip. Here is the picture:
  7. Conspiracy?????? Why would taking responsibility for a known problem involve a conspiracy?????
  8. I have a picture of a 2 engine fighter (CF100) with a orange ball on the nose under the fwd cockpit window, the ball has a black drawing of a witch riding a broom. Any idea re the history of this insignia?
  9. In any event, WestJet has claimed responsibility along with the costs of repair. Congrats to then for being right out front. However you have to wonder why the quick acceptance of guilt unless of course there was a known problem with the aircraft that may have dropped the ice.
  10. The following article gives you a perspective on how much the US spends on their military. The increase in spending is 54 billion ..... but evidently that is only a 9% increase. Trump lays out hike in military spending 48 minutes ago http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39108194 Image copyright Reuters Image caption President Trump's budget blueprint calls for a "historic increase in defence spending" US President Donald Trump is seeking to boost defence spending by $54bn (£43bn) in his proposed budget plan for 2018, which is about a 9% increase. The blueprint also calls for deep cuts elsewhere, including to foreign assistance and environmental budgets. But Mr Trump's plan leaves large welfare programmes such as Social Security and Medicare untouched, despite Republican calls for reform. The president is expected to release his final budget proposal in mid-March. "We're going to do more with less and make the government lean and accountable," Mr Trump said in a meeting with governors at the White House on Monday. The president, who vowed to increase military spending and preserve welfare programmes during his campaign, said the budget will focus on "military, safety, economic development". "It will include an historic increase in defence spending to rebuild the depleted military of the United States of America at a time we most need it," he said. The US spends more on defence than any other country at roughly $600bn (£481bn) annually. Seven ways the world could change under Trump Trump calls for US nuclear supremacy Mr Trump also said he would discuss his plans for infrastructure spending in a speech to Congress on Tuesday. "We're going to start spending on infrastructure big," he said. The Republican did not say how his budget proposal will tackle mandatory spending and taxes, promising those details to come later. Mr Trump pledged to cut taxes during his presidential campaign, which would likely add to the national debt. The White House sent Mr Trump's 2018 budget blueprint, which begins on 1 October, to federal agencies on Monday, The agencies will then review the plan and propose changes to the cuts as the White House prepares for negotiations with Congress. The Republican-controlled Congress must approve any federal spending. Mr Trump's plan is expected to face backlash from Democrats and some Republicans over cuts to domestic programmes.
  11. Aviation related but this story will also serve to remind us of how Blacks were treated / viewed in the 1920s in the USA. and of course the consequences of "phony" news. http://fly.historicwings.com/2017/02/the-bombing-of-tulsa/ THE BOMBING OF TULSA POSTED BY HW ON 27 FEB 2017 / 0 COMMENT Published on February 27, 2017 By Thomas Van Hare On the morning of June 1, 1921, the Ku Klux Klan and the white population of Tulsa made their move. At the sound of three blasts from a siren, they stormed the city’s wealthy African-American district of Greenwood. Yet the defending African-American citizens were ready. It had been a tense night of preparation for the battle they knew would come. Greenwood was host to a prosperous, wealthy, and well-educated community, but they had watched with increasing concern as the KKK steadily rose in power. They knew they were in a fight for survival and they were committed to defend every block of the community they had built. Both sides were well-armed. However, the KKK had one thing that the African-Americans did not — air power. The first aerial bombing in American history was in Tulsa, Oklahoma. It pitted Americans against Americans and it was a battle along racial lines. The ruins of North Detroit Avenue, looking at Booker T. Washington High School, the ruins of the Greenwood district, and the remains of Mount Zion Baptist Church. Photographer Arthur Dudley. S1989.004.5.46, Special Collections, McFarlin Library, The University of Tulsa. Seeds of Conflict The all-night stand-off between the white and black communities in Tulsa had begun on May 31, 1921. Mobs of white men had gathered at the courthouse calling for the lynching of an African-American man interned inside. As it turned out, the man wasn’t so much imprisoned as being protected for an alleged crime that he did not commit. Sheriff McCullough, Tulsa’s chief law enforcement official, made his best effort to protect the young man and dissipate the anger. Despite several meetings, nothing cooled the murderous intent of the crowd. As the day wore into evening, word of the white mob spread through the African-American community in Tulsa. The whites’ demand for the young man’s lynching were the product of the Ku Klux Klan, which had grown to 3,200 members in Tulsa. This was a city with a population of approximately 75,000. Tulsa County, including the city and surrounding areas, numbered about 110,000. Many whites were envious of the successes enjoyed on the “Black Wall Street”, the popular name for the African-American business district. Further, all they knew of the matter at hand was what had been because the Tulsa Tribune, which sounded alarming enough. As it happened, the newspaper story was little more than contrived falsehood. The “journalists”, who were perhaps associated with or at least influenced by the KKK, claimed that the young African-American had attempted to rape the 17 year old “orphaned” white woman. In actual fact, it was the black youth, Dick Rowland, who was the orphan. Along with his two sisters, he had been adopted by the Rowlands, a black family in Tulsa. The rest of the story was only very loosely based on the truth. The article even nicknamed the young man, “Diamond Dick”, a name carefully selected to create an image of the youth as a cocky, bejeweled street criminal prowling the streets and showing off. Outraged at the prospect that a “pure white woman” might have been attacked by an African-American, an angry white mob gathered outside the courthouse where Rowland was being held. Word spread quickly in both communities, which, until then, had lived together mostly peacefully. Groups of African-American men came armed with rifles and pistols, stating that they were not there to fight, but rather to offer their help as volunteers to the white Sheriff, who was also intent on protecting the courthouse and the young man from the white mob outside. From the article in the Tulsa Tribune on May 31, 1921, which apparently incited the rioting. Twice, the Sheriff McCullough sent the African-American volunteers away. He recognized that, even if their intent may have been to defend the young man and prevent him from being lynched by the angry mob, their very presence would likely only escalate the situation. His worry proved to have merit when on the second occasion, the white mob opened fire on the vastly outnumbered African-American men. The latter numbered perhaps 75, while the white mob numbered in the hundreds. As they were departing the area, some of the men in the white mob started the shooting. Two of the African-American men fell dead and the rest turned and fire back. It was a devastating and concentrated volley. Some reports claim that as many as ten white men were killed. In the panicked moments afterward, the African-Americans withdrew to a position a few blocks away. With nightfall, nothing seemed to cool the hotheads among the white mob. Not only was the young black youth still protected in the courthouse, but now a number of their own were shot dead. The KKK rallied and planned an all-out attack, intending to banish all of the African-Americans from Tulsa. The KKK sent out calls for their members to come and join the fight. For their part, the African-Americans vowed to defend their community from an assault they knew would soon come. The white mob vowed to get revenge for their losses and seize the young Dick Rowland and lynch him. Who was Dick Rowland? The young man at the center of the issue was named Dick Rowland. He was a 19 year old delivery man and shoe shiner, well-known in the community. His alleged crime was the “assault” of a white woman that supposedly had taken place on the 3rd floor of the Drexell Building in downtown Tulsa, when the young man entered the elevator. The white woman who was allegedly accosted, who was named Sarah Page, immediately denied any claim of “assault” and declined to press charges. Nonetheless, the newspaper published the account otherwise. In fact, it is entirely likely that Sarah Page and Dick Rowland knew each other fairly well, at least by sight — and perhaps even better than that. The shoeshine business owner that employed Rowland had arranged that the company’s employees could use the “Colored” bathrooms that were located on the third floor of the Drexell Building. Sarah Page operated the elevator in the building. Thus, probably she saw Rowland at least a couple of times a day. One African-American journalist, Mary E. Jones Parrish, later claimed that the so-called, “assault”, may have been that Rowland accidentally stepped on Page’s foot when boarding the elevator after using the bathroom upstairs. This caused her to cry out in pain. A clerk working the building on the floor ran to see what was happening. When Rowland saw the approaching clerk, he panicked and ran from the building. Like Page, the clerk too recognized Rowland by sight. The clerk immediately called the police to report the “crime”, probably over Sarah Page’s objection. It wasn’t long after that Rowland was arrested, reportedly at his home. Whatever actually happened that day, on May 30, 1921, the news article that followed the next day was sensational. Dick Rowland was claimed in the article to have identified himself as “Diamond Dick”. The woman was stated in the news article to have seen him looking up and the down the halls in a suspicious manner before attacking her, ripping her clothes. Even the moniker, “Diamond Dick”, seems doubtful in retrospect, although the article claimed Rowland used that title to identify himself because of he allegedly wore layers of gold and diamond jewelry — the absurdity of that should have been obvious based on the pay rate of shoeshine boy and delivery man. The “assault” of the young “orphaned” women was claimed without any dissenting view. Predictably, the article had an effect — the journalists were most probably looking for an incident to stir up trouble. For the KKK, the false claims in the newspaper gave them the pretext to get the support needed to launch a full-on assault of the African-American district in Tulsa. Some say that Sarah Page and Dick Rowland may have a secret, interracial relationship. If so, the “assault” was misreported — it seems more likely that the matter involved the aftermath of a lover’s fight. Others, including lawyers who regularly had their shoes shined by Rowland, knew the young man well. He was the adopted son of a local African-American businessman. Most simply knew that the charge couldn’t be true. Many of the city’s attorneys even commented as such. To their knowledge, Rowland simply wasn’t violent or aggressive at all. To have attacked a woman at all was simply too out of character to be believable in their experience. Nonetheless, events quickly spiraled out of control. The main incitement came when the Tulsa Tribune supposedly blared a headline late on May 31 in the city edition of the Tulsa Tribune (recalled by residents later, but all copies have been lost) calling on the populace to, “To Lynch Negro Tonight.” The public went wild based on the “fake news”. The KKK rallied many to support their call for a public, if entirely extrajudicial lynching. When dawn broke, the battle for Tulsa began. As the first rays of sunlight touched the city, a siren blared three times as the signal to begin the attack. The first white man to rise in the charge was cut down when a defending African-American sniper hit him with a single shot from his rifle. A rallying cry went up and soon crowds of hundreds of white men charged forward, intent on rampaging through the streets of the African-American district of Tulsa. Many of these were members of the KKK. The white mob pressed toward the center of the African-American community where stood their church, the Mount Zion Baptist Church. As they advanced, they were shooting any who stood in their way. They began setting fire to homes, meaning to burn all of the residences as well as the African-American business district. This area was so prosperous and successful that was locally known as the “Black Wall Street”. On the map, it is defined as the areas along Archer Street and Greenwood Avenue in downtown Tulsa. The Black Wall Street district of Tulsa burns as thick black smoke fills the skies. Not unexpectedly, resistance against the KKK-led white mob was fierce. A running street battle followed. Some of the homes were soon burning and many among the defenders were shot and injured. Some were killed. Many men stood guard to defend their homes, putting up stiff resistance on their as the white mob advanced, only to be finally shot and killed. Tulsa’s leading medical doctor died on his doorstep as he retreated into his house, firing back. Lawyers, business owners, family men, and workers battled at every house and corner. The defending African-American community was vastly outnumbered, however. Soon many homes on the outer fringes of the district were burning and black smoke filled the air. The main street and commercial district of “Black Wall Street” and the community’s church, however, still remained beyond the reach of the advancing armed mob. The defenders were holding their ground, more or less, despite the vast numbers in the white mob. The Oklahoma National Guard arrives in Tulsa; the truck that mounted a machinegun is seen in the lower left of this rare and unique photograph. Almost from the start, the Governor of Oklahoma, Gov. Robertson, declared martial law. The Oklahoma National Guard was mobilized and quickly sent in to stabilize the situation. The forces deployed quickly under the command of Major L.F. J. Rooney, himself a veteran of World War I. Tulsa’s fire department tried to respond to the first fires but its engines were fired on by the white mob. They retreated, finding themselves prevented from entering the African-American districts and unable to fight the fires. The National Guard mounted its weapons and drove into the chaos, hoping to stabilize the situation. None of the official institutions of government were favoring the KKK, not the National Guard, nor the Sheriff, nor the fire department, mayor, or Governor of Oklahoma. The National Guard mounted a machine gun on the flatbed of one of their small trucks and then drove into the Greenwood District. It was intended to be a show of force that would quell the riots. The mission did not fare well. First, the truck was fired upon by the white mob, which assumed correctly it was defending the African-American community. Then the truck retreated from the white mob and raced into the Greenwood District. There, it was fired upon by the African-American defenders who saw its coming heralded by the sound of heavy gunfire. As the battle raged, white vigilante squads made “arrests” of dozens of African-Americans who attempted to get out of the city. Luckily, a massacre of those picked up was averted when the Oklahoma National Guard stepped in. The Guardsmen took those detained from the hands of the mob, sometimes literally at gunpoint. Those rescued were marched to holding areas. The wounded were carried to the hospital in the Greenwood District, but then evacuated when the white mob set it on fire. A Curtiss JN-4 Jenny biplane of the type that the US Army sold as surplus after the war, c. 1918. Photo Credit: Harrison S. Kerrick Air Power Employed With the attack on Tulsa less than an hour old, a group of pilots from Tulsa’s white community gathered at the nearby airport of Curtiss-Southwest Field. Almost certainly, these were the commercial flight crews working for the Curtiss-Southwest Airplane Company, a firm that had formed a year and a half earlier in 1919 and which, more or less, ran the airport of the same name. Curtiss-Southwest was the nation’s first commercial interstate air freight shipping business, though that honor is usually forgotten due to what they did that day. The company was also a dealer for the Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company, selling surplus government planes and new models from the Curtiss company to the general public. Advertising in the Oklahoma City Times, Friday, August 1, 1919, page 14. Between them, the pilots prepared about a dozen or more light planes. These were surplus World War I Curtiss JN-4 Jenny training planes that had been purchased from the US Army Signal Corps after the end of the war. Curtiss-Southwest put these planes to work in its new airfreight business. Others were resold by the Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company to the general public. The US Army sold the planes at a price of $1,500 each and Curtiss-Southwest marked up and resold the planes to willing buyers at a significant profit, charging between $2,500 and $4,000 each. Newly built models directly from the Curtiss factory went for $5,000 to $9,000, depending on the type of engine mounted. Most of the planes that flew that day had served as trainers for America’s military pilots during the First World War. The company, while offering new planes to the public, itself was somewhat underfunded. As such, it flew only surplus, used US Army planes. Most of these had flown at the University of Texas military flight training program at Kelly Field, in San Antonio. Kelly Field had trained over 320 squadrons of pilots during the war. These Curtiss JN-4 Jenny biplanes were the same type later made famous for barnstorming across much of middle America, putting on one-plane airshows and offering rides for a few dollars each. Curtiss JN-4 Jenny biplane trainers flying in formation from Kelly field, Texas; these would later be made surplus and sold to the general public; perhaps some of these very planes shown participated in the bombing of Tulsa. Photo Credit: US Army Air Service With the riots in full swing, the pilots at Curtiss-Southwest Field didn’t have barnstorming or their usual oil business flying on their mind. Each pilot took an “observer” on board and, as some reports later claimed, loaded up their planes with balls of fabric soaked in turpentine. Matches were carried to light them incendiary balls on fire before dropping. They took off at 6:00 am, returning and refueling to fly additional missions later in the morning and in the early afternoon. They employed the turpentine-soaked balls as makeshift “bombs”, or more properly “fire bombs”. With these, they hoped to start fires in the center of the African-American business district. In the first hours, those areas were beyond the reach of the still advancing mob, which was facing stiff defense from the African-American residents. It was a house-to-house fight, battled block by block. The height of the battle was centered on Standpipe Hill, a few blocks from the Mount Zion Baptist Church. Once aloft, the pilots were guided by the first clouds of black smoke from the outskirts of the targeted area. It didn’t take long for them to fly the short distance to the center of Tulsa and arrive over the Greenwood District. They began orbiting together in a loose formation as the “observers” prepared their turpentine rag balls for the attack. Some of the “observers” also carried rifles aloft, intent on shooting any they saw below. A few carried sticks of TNT, which they lit and dropped as aerial bombs. Mount Zion Baptist Church burns after seeing its roof set afire from the attacking biplanes. One of the residents of the Greenwood District, Mary E. Jones Parrish, was a trained journalist. She later wrote that she and her neighbors heard the approach roar of the aircraft engines. They looked out the windows of their homes to see what was happening. She then related, if perhaps a bit too poetically: One of the planes spotted two men and their wives running across an open field and, swooping low, dropped a hail of lead balls or stones, hoping to kill them. They missed. Two of the four were identified as Dr. Payne and Mr. Robinson — the names of their wives were not recorded. They survived to later testify about the events. In the hour or so that followed, each plane let loose their loads of these fire bombs from low altitude, setting them alight just before they were dropped. This was a dangerous thing to attempt from inside the cockpit of a wood, wire and fabric biplane, yet they were successful and none were burned. They targeted the neighborhoods, business district, and the Mount Zion Baptist Church. Mainly, they aimed for the flat rooftops of the buildings. Once the supply of firebombs were exhausted, those planes with rifles in the hands of the “observers” made low passes over the Greenwood District shooting at any they saw on the ground. They returned to the airfield for more firebombs, ammunition, and fuel. During one low pass by a biplane, one of the men leaned out to take a shot. He was hit instead by return fire from an African-American sharpshooter. He was either killed by the bullet or died when he fell from the plane to the ground. Ten days later, the event was reported in several newspapers, including the Chicago Defender, which related, “One man, leaning far out from an airplane, was brought down by the bullet of a sharp shooter and his body burst upon the ground.” Another made a pass and fired at two fleeing boys, who were shunted into a house and brought to safety by an older African-American woman. Hitting a pair of running boys from a handheld single-shot rifle in the cockpit of an airplane flying overhead is no easy feat. The plane did not circle back to shoot again. Soon firebombs were being tossed out of the planes onto the buildings below. While they may not have had a great effect with their rifles, the firebombing proved devastating. As the flaming turpentine balls fell, the buildings across the Greenwood District soon were burning out of control. The fire department, being held back by the white mob, could do nothing but watch from a distance. As the fires intensified, many residents fled their homes, running for their lives. These too fell into the hands of wandering vigilante groups who were patrolling the outskirts of the District. The Mount Zion Baptist Church caught fire after a hail of well-placed firebombs. Curtiss JN-4 Jenny biplane trainers flying in formation over Kelly field, Texas; perhaps some of these very planes shown participated in the bombing of Tulsa. Photo Credit: US Army Air Service Eyewitness Testimony of the Aerial Bombing In the city center, one of the town’s most prosperous African-American men, a lawyer named Buck Colbert Franklin, who would later prove instrumental in the legal actions that followed the riots, wrote of his experience witnessing the aerial firebombing of Tulsa. What he described was the volleys of turpentine-soaked rag balls falling on the rooftops of the buildings along “Black Wall Street”. He abandoned the building and made his way through the streets, remarking at the still burning aerial firebombs that marked the way. Another eyewitness, an African-American named Dr. R. T. Bridgewater, who served an assistant county physician, stated that he was “near my residence and aeroplanes began to fly over us, in some instances very low to the ground”. He added that he heard a woman say, “look out for the aeroplanes, they are shooting upon us.” A white crowd involved in looting the Woods Building on the corner of Greenwood and Archer in Tulsa’s “Black Wall Street” area. Photographer unknown. 1989.004.5.52, Special Collections, McFarlin Library, The University of Tulsa Later, the KKK wrote of its achievement in an article in a newspaper called, “The Nation”. The writer recounted: The actual number was probably twelve to fourteen planes, but the KKK writer probably didn’t know that. Mr. W. I. Brown, a porter with the Katy Railroad company, arrived to Tulsa with the National Guard. He reported: With their stores of fire bombs and TNT exhausted, the planes turned again toward a landing at Curtiss-Southwest Field. Some fanned out into the surrounding countryside, looking for those fleeing the city. One of the biplanes spotted a group of fleeing African-Americans and dove to attack, firing on them with the rifle that the “observer” carried. One man was killed, his name was recorded later as probably Ed Lockard. He died from a bullet to the back of the neck. That attack took place between six and eight miles from Tulsa. Detainees being housed in McNulty Park. Photographer Joseph Hause. 1989.004.5.23, Special Collections, McFarlin Library, The University of Tulsa. Detention Centers At the height of the rioting, Mayor Evans and Governor Robertson set up detention centers outside the district to hold those saved from the vigilante gangs of white men. One detention center was located at the Tulsa Convention Hall on 105 West Brady Street. Another center was set up at McNulty Baseball Park, located between Ninth and Tenth Streets on Elgin Avenue. In addition, the oil fairgrounds at Lewis Avenue and Federal (Admiral) Boulevard were pressed into service. Approximately 6,000 African-Americans were detained during the day of the riots and in the days that followed. When the day ended, all that remained of the Greenwood District and “Black Wall Street” were burnt out neighborhoods. A few stragglers walked amidst the smoking homes and businesses. These too were rounded up by the National Guard. Some of those detained were held for up to eight days — none were ever charged with a crime. On release, they were given identity cards to present in the event that they wanted free passage into white neighborhoods or business districts. On returning to their neighborhoods all they could do was look on hopelessly at the devastation that had been wrought. The Red Cross provided tents and some basic supplies for subsistence. Aftermath of the Riots In the aftermath of the burning of Tulsa’s “Black Wall Street”, hundreds of African-Americans fled the city and never came back. At the railway station, employees reported that hundreds of one-way tickets were sold. Trains were filled to capacity. Tulsa’s African-American community, which had achieved the American Dream and had built one of the most prosperous communities in the entire United States — white or black — was deeply wounded. “Black Wall Street” would be rebuilt, but it would take years. The scars from that day’s rioting remain to this day. The story of how it happened, however, was quietly swept under the rug. For decades, nobody mentioned it. It wasn’t taught in schools. It wasn’t acknowledged by the State of Oklahoma or the city. It was only in recent years many in Tulsa learned what happened on that fateful day in 1921 when the city and State reversed positions and published the story. Ruined buildings along the main street, the so-called “Black Wall Street”, showing the clear signs of having burned down from the top, where rafters and debris fall into the building center, rather than fall outward, as when burned or exploded from below at street level. It seems clear that without the aerial bombing, much of the African-American community in Tulsa would probably not have burned so completely. The damage would have been extensive, but with the firebombing, it totaled an estimated $23 million ($310 million in inflation corrected values). Homes, businesses, schools, and even the Mount Zion Baptist Church had all burned to the ground, though the steeple remained. Like a symbol of hope, it towered over the burned out streets. In all, 35 city blocks were destroyed. Fully 1,256 residences were simply gone. The destruction was staggering — in all, 21 churches and 20 groceries stores were burned, as well as two banks, a hospital, the post office (a Federal government building), and more than 600 businesses. Over 4,000 residents were left homeless. The number of dead is still unknown but may have been up to 300 — the Red Cross, which mobilized afterward, claimed that number. Others put the figure at less than 100. Many more were injured. The devastation was so vast that it wouldn’t be until World War II with the bombings of Berlin and Hamburg that such damage would be repeated on an urban area. The makeshift firebombs, as turned out, were extraordinarily effective. During the rioting, homes and businesses were looted and even years later, the effects of that were felt. As the lawyer, Buck Colbert Franklin, wrote: “For years black women would see white women walking down the street in their jewelry and snatch it off.” Buck Colbert Franklin, at right, the African-American lawyer who would later pave the way for the reconstruction, sits in a Red Cross tent after the riots. In his capacity as a lawyer, Buck Colbert Franklin, the survivor of the riots who wrote about leaving his office amidst the hailstone-sounds of the burning turpentine balls, later took on major role in the rebuilding of the community. Incredibly, just six days after the firebombing, on June 7, 1921, the KKK convinced locally elected city council officials to pass a fire code law that barred the African-Americans from rebuilding their business. Buck Colbert Franklin put his legal training to the task and filed suit, claiming it was wrong — in fact, his case was sound. The KKK and other white developers sought to secure the cleared properties for themselves, illegally barring the return of the former residents, since none could rebuild. They had many friends in the courts and most would have given up — but not Franklin. He fought and watched as his case was defeated first in the lower courts based on the influence of the KKK. Next, he battled up through multiple appeals to ever higher courts. One by one, each ruled against him, reflecting the hidden power of the KKK. Franklin filed his final appeal with the Oklahoma Supreme Court. There, finally above the reach of the KKK, a full review of law and his pleadings were undertaken. He prevailed completely. The fire code law was declared unconstitutional and stricken in its entirety. With that, the rebuilding of the Greenwood District and Black Wall Street could finally begin — it was a process that had taken several years in the courts. Some of the 35 city blocks that burned during the riots in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The Pilots and Planes The pilots and “observers” who flew that day and dropped their homemade firebombs were never officially identified. Almost certainly, they were the very men who flew for the Curtiss-Southwest Airplane Company. They were never arrested, fined, or even sanctioned in any way. Their planes were not impounded either. The Civil Aviation Authorities, the Governor of Oklahoma, and the Mayor simply looked the other way. Although they had not supported the white rioters, they knew not to mess with the KKK. No investigation followed. The greatest irony came that afternoon when the Tulsa police hired the Curtiss-Southwest Airplane Company to fly an aerial survey of the burning Greenwood District so they could assess the damage. The pilots complied, of course, getting paid to carry police officers over the District to see the very damage they themselves had caused. They got away with murder and massive property destruction — and even got paid afterward to document their evil work. Duncan McIntyre, chief pilot of the Curtiss-Southwest Airplane Company; he almost certainly did not participate in the firebombing, though his pilots did. Photo Credit: Tulsa Air and Space Museum Today, we can only guess at their identities. They were almost certainly the company pilots. Among many, one pilot appears to be innocent — it seems doubtful that they were led into the air that day by the company’s chief pilot, Duncan A. McIntyre. He was from New Zealand and, as such, was unlikely to have been supportive or involved in any way. He had been previously an expert barnstorming pilot who flew for a time in the Pacific Northwest before moving to Tulsa, Oklahoma. He was not a member or supporter of the KKK. We know only a few of the other names of the pilots employed at the company. One was John L. Moran — he is listed as an employee in January 1920, in an article that appeared in the Houston Post. Another, W. E. Campbell, was listed in 1919 as the company manager and a pilot. Another man is identified as Mr. B. L. Humphries. He was described as the company president in a newspaper article dating from October 1919. It is unclear, however, if he was a pilot at the time. Another pilot was named Mr. B. Goode. He is cited in the Barber County Index, a newspaper in Kansas, as a pilot of the company in March 1920. Two other pilots, “Happy” Bagnall and Bert Isason are named as working for the company in an article in the Houston Post on February 23, 1920. The others have faded into anonymity with the passage of time. Which, if any, of these men named here participated in the attack is unknown, though the company didn’t have many pilots. Therefore, at least some, if not most of these named were likely to have been involved. Identifying the individual aircraft that were used is also difficult, if not impossible. In 1921, private aircraft were not yet required to be registered with the civil aviation authorities. That practice would begin in the years after. Even so, those records would show little more than the company name, which we know already anyway. We have no records to identify which planes were involved, such as by manufacturing number. What we do know, however, is that Curtiss-Southwest Field had just 13 planes — all were Curtiss JN-4 Jenny biplanes. One researcher claims that a four-seat, closed cockpit Stinson Detroiter was also at the field, though based on production dates — the first flight of the type was in 1926 — that could not have been possible. Ad in the Morning Tulsa Daily World newspaper from November 16, 1919, for an airshow put on by the Curtiss-Southwest Airplane Company in Tulsa — ironically, the event promises a “Bombing Raid”. Another plane involved was later identified as owned by the so-called, “St. Clair Oil Company”. More probably, this was the plane of the Sinclair Oil Company. That biplane, also a Curtiss Jenny, was otherwise used for aerial surveys and mapping of the oil fields. Further, the Sinclair Oil Company is known to have provided fuel to the Curtiss-Southwest Airplane Company. Their plane, probably purchased from Curtiss-Southwest, was based at the same field. The only other aircraft within the area was at a nearby field, Paul Arbon Air Field. It was also a Curtiss Jenny. Most likely, however, it did not participate in the attack as there were no reports of any flight activity from that field that day. That the Sinclair Oil company biplane was employed in the attack is stated in a lawsuit filed two years later. The lawsuit demanded reparations for houses that were burned down (this was the suit that called the owner, “St. Clair Oil Company”). Notably, there were no other aircraft in the area that could have reached Tulsa that day, including private aircraft. Thus, based on the number of planes flying, we can paint a very strong case against the Curtiss-Southwest Airplane Company’s remaining thirteen Curtiss Jenny biplanes and the one plane from Sinclair Oil as being the culprits. Put simply, there were simply no other planes around Tulsa to have flown that day, nor pilots whatsoever. The lawsuit evidence on the Sinclair Oil plane is plain. Case No. 23, 331 states flatly: Thus, we surmise that at least one of the city’s police department, a Captain named J. R. Blaine, personally was involved in the attack — if the pleadings are to be believed. His name is somewhat in doubt, however, though a similar name appears in the county records of police officers at the time. Regardless, it seems that at least one police captain served as an “observer” on the Sinclair Oil biplane and dropped incendiaries on the residential areas of the Greenwood District. That the Curtiss-Southwest Airplane Company’s planes were involved was confirmed further by one of those who escaped the riots, the same African-American woman journalist, Mary E. Jones Parrish. While fleeing the city, she recounted passing an airfield and seeing, “planes out of their sheds, all in readiness for flying, and these men with high-powered rifles getting into them.” There were no other airfields anywhere within 200 miles of Tulsa that had served more than one airplane, nor any others that had hangars, what she called, “sheds” — she could only be describing Curtiss-Southwest Field. An African-American man stands before the ruins of his home in Tulsa after the firebombing. Final Words Despite all the evidence, there are still those who dispute the use of airplanes to firebomb Tulsa that day. One who has researched the matter extensively is Richard S. Warner. His opinion was formed when he undertook a study as part of an official project funded to research the effects of the riots on Tulsa and what reparations might be paid. He claims that the use of aircraft in the attack is overstated: If his claim has merit, the case of Tulsa is interesting — details are many, while the overall picture is difficult to yet completely understand. Aircraft were certainly used and they undoubtedly set many fires. Many reported shooting from the airplanes at people on the ground. Some even claimed that the airplanes turned the tide of the battle; they note that for nearly two hours, the African-American defenders of their neighborhoods had held out successfully. With the firebombing, however, the defense fell quickly and a rout began. Amidst the flames, the citizens of the Greenwood District scattered in the face of the advancing white mob and chased by a dozen airplanes overhead. Contemporary photograph of the damage done, from one of the local newspapers at the time of the riots. Click to expand for closer examination. Years later, the airport called Curtiss-Southwest Field was closed down and dismantled. Today, nothing remains of the old airfield or its two hangars. The area where it was located is at Apache Street and Memorial Drive in Tulsa. Not even a plaque marks the spot from where the first bombing of an American city was launched. Sadly, most of the insurance claims filed by the residents and business owners for the damage done were denied at the time. The policies were either not honored outright (probably a sign of racism) or contained riders that exempted damage from what amounted to a “force majeure” event. Predictably, a flurry of lawsuits followed; due to the influence of the KKK, it appears that most were unsuccessful. In the Tulsa riots, America showed its darkest side. For years, Oklahoma sought to suppress any mention of the riots. It was only in 1996, on the 75th anniversary of the riots, that the state finally included mention of the riots in the official histories. As for Dick Rowland, he was never charged with a crime. He survived the riots under the protection of the Sheriff and lived the rest of his life in freedom. Sarah Page, deeply troubled at the events that were taken in her name, left Tulsa on the train — to where, nobody knows. Apparently, she never came back. Tulsa burns during the height of the race riot on June 1, 1921. ONE LAST BIT OF AVIATION TRIVIA The firebombing of Tulsa’s African-American Greenwood District and Black Wall Street gave rise to two aviation-related philosophies in the African-American community. The first was espoused by the radical followers of Marcus Garvey. They called for African-American men to train as pilots and prepare for a coming race war. The followers of Garvey believed that a final battle would be fought both in the air, at sea, and on the ground. The vision was simple — if African-Americans did not arm themselves with the latest technologies, they would surely die; the battle to come would be apocalyptic. They saw it as a fight to the death, where afterwards only one of the two “races” would survive. Garvey called for the community to start building battleships, airplanes, and tanks. The second vision of African-American involvement in aviation was more peaceful in its focus — critically, it was also less expensive. This view was popularized by newspaper writers of popular African-American bureaus, such as the Chicago Defender, Pittsburgh Courier, New York Age, and Baltimore Afro-American. This approach highlighted the commercial value of aviation and sought to play down the military uses of airplanes. African-Americans should become pilots, in this school of thought, because it would foster social change and drum out stereotypes that blacks were incompetent, unable to master sophisticated technologies, lacked ambition, and were easily frightened. African-American involvement in aviation would bring real democracy to America, so they claimed. Over time, this second vision won out. The seeds of African-American involvement in aviation were thus planted after the devastation of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Ultimately, this vision would culminate too in the legacy of the Tuskegee Airmen of World War II. The example set also helped give rise to the non-violence of Martin Luther King, Jr., in the 1960s struggle for equality in America.
  12. Seems there is a hidden down side to the legal growing of medicinal marijuana for your own use or if you are a landlord. If and when the growning of marijuana is made legal it appears there will still be consequences. 'You can lose everything': Tenant's medical marijuana grow-op costs landlord insurance 'A grow-op, whether legal or not, is still a high-risk activity,' Insurance Bureau says By Rosa Marchitelli, CBC News Posted: Feb 27, 2017 2:00 AM PT| Last Updated: Feb 27, 2017 2:00 AM PT B.C. landlord Darryl Spencer found he had little recourse when his insurance was cancelled because a tenant was growing marijuana. Longtime landlord Darryl Spencer was left scrambling for insurance after discovering a tenant was growing dozens of medical marijuana plants inside and outside his rental house. When the landlord told his insurance company about the perfectly legal grow-op, his coverage was cancelled, leaving him with no insurance, few rights and a big cleanup bill. The downstairs tenant in Spencer's Kamloops, B.C., rental property got a medical marijuana licence that allowed him to legally grow as many as 60 plants without his landlord's permission or knowledge. A call from a concerned neighbour prompted Spencer, who is also a retired fire inspector, to check out the home he's rented out to different tenants for a decade. Spencer's tenant started a medical marijuana grow-op in the lower level apartment without his knowledge. (Darryl Spencer) He discovered a mess of extension cords, fans and bright lights packed into a room filled with dozens of marijuana plants. The upstairs tenant, a woman with a small child, was complaining about heat radiating through the walls and electrical breakers going off. "I was worried about the fire hazard. That was my first thought because of the extension cords, the use of electricity and that something could catch fire," Spencer told Go Public. The tenant had dozens of plants growing near the laundry room in the rental house owned by Spencer. (Darryl Spencer) Under new federal rules introduced last August, landlords have little recourse if a tenant is growing licensed medical marijuana. They don't even have the right to know it's happening. Yet it's landlords who are being denied insurance coverage when a tenant is growing medical pot. Go Public also found, while the federal government implemented the rules, it wants local authorities to ensure medical grow-operations are being set up and run safely. More than 30,000 people in Canada have permits to grow cannabis for their personal medical use. When Spencer notified his insurance company about the tenant's grow-op, Gore Mutual Insurance cancelled his coverage. "They wouldn't cover claims to do with medical marijuana or air quality contamination," he says. 'You can lose everything you worked so hard for your whole life.' In a statement to Go Public, Gore Mutual Insurance says it "does not provide coverage for marijuana grow-operations regardless of their legality because this type of operation in a residential building presents inherent insurance risks." Those risks, the company says, include "a greater likelihood of water damage, mould, fire, vandalism and burglary." Under most basic home insurance policies, marijuana-related damages or anything that companies believe is "high risk" is not covered. That view is shared by many insurance companies, according to the Insurance Bureau of Canada. "While regulations may allow for the legal growing of marijuana for medical purposes, it does not change the structural risk grow-ops pose to homes and condos," Andrew McGrath, spokesman for the Insurance Bureau, tells Go Public in an email. "The operation of a grow-op, whether legal or not, is still a high-risk activity." Gore Mutual Insurance told Spencer it might reinstate his coverage if he got rid of the tenant and took specific steps to ensure the house was safe to live in. The insurance company also wanted air and soil testing, plumbing and electrical inspections, and the house checked for mould. Spencer did it all, while searching for another insurance company that would cover him right away. None would. "I went all that time with no insurance which was pretty nerve-wracking knowing there were many implications involved there. You can lose everything you worked so hard for your whole life," he says. The tenant did move out, but only after Spencer paid him $1,300 to leave and returned his full damage deposit despite issues with the suite. All in, Spencer estimates he's out more than $5,000 in costs related to the medical grow-op. Privacy trumps landlord rights In February 2016, a Federal Court judge gave Health Canada six months to come up with new rules that would give medical marijuana patients better access to pot, allowing more patients to grow it at home. Spencer says he was worried about safety when he saw the amount of chemicals in the tenant's unit. (Darryl Spencer) Its response was the new Access to Cannabis for Medical Purposes Regulations, which came into effect Aug. 24, 2016. "The new regulations do not require individuals who wish to produce a limited amount in their residence to notify or seek the consent of their landlords as such requirements would likely infringe on their right to reasonable access to cannabis for medical purposes," Health Canada spokesman André Gagnon wrote in a statement to Go Public. Landlord B.C., an advocacy group for landlords, says it respects the importance of marijuana therapy for those who need it. But CEO David Hutniak says the group believes property rights also are important. "[Health Canada] basically made the decisions, from our perspective, in a vacuum," he says. David Hutniak, CEO of Landlord B.C., says Health Canada should have considered the impact on property rentals and insurance when approving grow-ops. (Christer Waara/CBC) Hutniak says the federal government failed to provide clear direction for landlords and insurance companies when it made changes to medical marijuana rules. Safety inspections not done Under the new rules, Health Canada gives specific guidelines on how to safely set up medical grow-ops. But when it comes to checking if safety rules are being followed, the federal department is leaving that to municipalities. Outdoor grow op The tenant was also growing marijuana in a greenhouse on Spencer's property. The problem, according to the development and engineering services director for Kamloops, is federal privacy rules prevent local authorities from knowing where marijuana is being grown. "We don't get a list of the address, so we can't proactively go around and do inspections," Marvin Kwiatkowski says. There also is no system in place to proactively check if tenants are growing the allowed number of plants and following their permit. Go Public put the issue to federal Health Minister Jane Philpott, but her office declined an interview, saying the federal government's role is to ensure people who need medical marijuana have access. Two months after his insurance was cancelled, Spencer found a company that specializes in covering medical grow-operations. The coverage cost almost twice what he used to pay and has a much higher deductible. After Go Public contacted his original insurer, Gore Mutual, it offered to reinstate Spencer's policy for almost the same amount he used to pay. Spencer says he's spent thousands of dollars in order to get his rental property insurance reinstated. (CBC) Spencer took Gore up on the offer, and says it's the federal government that needs to make changes. "This has been a big mistake and I hope it gets rectified soon."
  13. deicer, as I have said before, I don't like President Trump, but that been said, it is you who continue to live in Fantasyland, nothing you say or post on on this forum will change the fact that he is the POTUS. Unless you live in the US and are eligible to vote, nothing you post will have any influence on his reelection. So.........(fill in the blank).
  14. I agree Jaydee that may have worked for the Syrian refugees but, and there is always a but Refugee crisis: Record 65 million people forced to flee homes, UN says 24 people were displaced from their homes every minute of every day during 2015 The Independent Online Dagahaley refugee camp makes up part of the Dadaab settlement Getty The number of refugees in the world has reached the highest level ever recorded, according to figures published by the United Nations (UN). After an increase of five million last year, the number of people displaced by conflict – refugees, asylum seekers or those displaced internally – was at an estimated 65.3 million by the end of 2015. It is the equivalent of one in every 113 people on the planet, according to the UN Refugee Agency, and if considered a nation would make up the 21st largest in the world. READ Lamenting the largest refugee crisis of our time, Ban Ki-moon, the UN Secretary General,described it "not just a crisis of numbers", but "a crisis of solidarity.” More than half of the world's refugee come from Syria, Afghanistan and Somalia. (UNHCR) The UN said 86 per cent of the refugees under its mandate were being sheltered in low- and middle-income countries. If the closure the Dadaab camp in Kenya, the largest refugee settlement in the world, is to go ahead it will risk a "humanitarian disaster", according to campaigners. Johan Eldebo, World Vision UK’s Senior Humanitarian Policy Adviser, said in a statement: “The Kenyan Government, like many others, is struggling to help millions of displaced and desperate people. "But this is not just an issue for Kenya or Africa. Over 200,000 refugees have risked their lives this year to cross the Mediterranean to Europe. More than a quarter has come from Somalia and other war-torn East African countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo and Burundi. READ MORE 20 children 'die of thirst after being abandoned by people smugglers' “It’s time for Europe and the rest of the world to accept that we can’t wish the refugee challenge away. We must take collective action to address the root causes driving migration and ensure refugees are not marginalised, or left unproductive for years in camps. Children must be given education, communities should have access to healthcare and adults must have work opportunities. Such factors restore dignity and reduce reliance on expensive and unsustainable aid hand-outs." Filippo Grandi, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, last week warned of a "climate of xenophobia" gripping Europe. Speaking in Tehran, he said: "Refugees don't bring danger but flee from dangerous places.