j.k.

Members
  • Content Count

    336
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by j.k.

  1. What? Nobody to buy a pizza? Seriously though... That's what travel insurance and self sufficiency is for... Go book a room! Feed your children! Take a taxi! Oooooh... fending for yourself in this world... The horror. If you can afford a week or two vacation for your family you can pay a couple hundred bucks for a last minute hotel booking for the night to look after your family and then sort it out with the airline or the insurance when you get home... Those people will absolutely fly Westjet again if they are the cheapest option by 2$...
  2. I'm not saying that. As I stated "truths"... But somebody will inevitably have a problem with him and anything he says no matter how right it might be. Some are more interested in shouting down discourse because of the messenger rather than listening to an idea on its own merit. It's impossible to bring up some things now, impossible to reference some people now, without someone else being deeply offended. Anyway... my statement was more a joke about that... "LoL"... and the association to the "victims" of this well handled oceanic diversion and recovery.
  3. "non-contributing zero" Sums it up well... LoL... Be careful about dropping Louis CK truths though... Someone will have a problem with that too.
  4. The Pilots made a great decision... probably just inside ETOPs when the issue occurred, well ahead of the ETP... a little bit of figuring and coordinating was likely before the turn around which took them further out... but why chance it with 1 system left over a big ocean into a base with minimal support and a shortish runway. The flight got back to YVR at 1433. Replacement flight left YVR at 1936, into OGG late that evening - Pax didn't miss any nights... Less than 5 hours in the terminal... all considered not too bad IMO. If you can't get by with a 10 dollar sandwich and a co
  5. I heard A350-1000 orders are in the works too as a 777 replacement... not B777X.
  6. Shunning more Boeings plays well politically too after the BS from Boeing and the Americans.
  7. How does it stall progression? Wasn't Swoop going to do that anyway?
  8. It's like a Mexican standoff. Hamilton wants the airlines' commitments before expansion, the airlines want the expansion before committing... Hamilton loses either way.
  9. I tried to take the flight a few times... Every time the flight was full or close to full. They had just moved to 3x daily from 2x... if I recall when they launched the route a few years back it was only 1x. I suspect it's more than light loads that caused the route to be pulled... maybe politicking with airport authority or something.
  10. Was it a MAX or NG? Sounds like NG... "737-800"
  11. Sounds like a great reason to bilk taxpayers for a bunch of business class trips around the world... "research"...
  12. Yeah, they totally showed everyone on the Atlantic how to do it with the 767 operation...
  13. Swoop is a new airline. They still need the required FAA approvals to operate into the US. Once approved it's open skies. Seems pretty amateur that they wouldn't have this taken care of ahead of time, before they started selling the tickets. Swoop should be rebooking all the affected people on other airlines, or wet leading replacements for every flight cancelled... not making excuses and giving refunds. Where's Gabor when there is a real complaint to raise?
  14. No matter what the will a always be someone who would rather commute, but it certainly doesn't help being based on some of the most expensive cities in the planet (YVR, YYZ). Especially as effective pay goes down, while inflation goes up, taxes go up, pension costs more, utilities up, interest rates rise... free cash gets tight when average home price is over a million... Companies need to pay to afford a life in the city you're based in...
  15. CDM is anything but collaborative. Guaranteed delays...
  16. Jazz policies? Yeah, yeah there's an AC FOM note... 1/2", trimmed... probably the line right below no facial hair below your upper lip line for those wearing moustaches. I haven't heard anyone complaining against the moustache guys with bushy staches or handlebars wrapping down the sides.
  17. Put the strawman back in the bag. Ties and beards and backwards ball caps are completely different things... and I'm sure there are bankers with beards. And you're wrong.
  18. I originally thought/heard that also, but I have it on good authority that's actually not true. It was coming anyway. Jeez, I don't know why anyone cares! Beards are accepted in our society... From business to government to academia to celebrities...
  19. "Published grooming standards" Lol, got that brochure in the mail I think... And some guys need a haircut, or to fix whatever it is they've been getting that they call a haircut... some are deathly in need of new shoes, others should dryclean their pants for Fs sake... or get rid of the wheels from China that light up pink when you walk... Everyone I see wearing beards look great. Better than some of the staches I've seen over the years at least... I say keep on keepin on...
  20. Absolutely. No disagreement from me there... My post was only speculating what they were doing that led then into an unacceptable position... one guy looking outside, figuring he's lining up about where dolpn is, 4-5 mile final, while the other is in a rush to select the flap, the gear, do the landing checklist, etc. and nobody crosschecking inside...
  21. For the sake of accuracy, it's DME 6.6, but 4.5nm from RWY 06. I think rushed is the threat here... "Do you got it?" "Uhhhh... uhhhh, I think I see it, uhhhh yeah there it is..." "Cleared the visual" "SH!T! Better get down..." CLICK, CLICK, "FLAPS! GEAR!" "Uh... SH!T... that's not it! GO AROUND, FLAPS!"... The pressure we put on ourselves to take the visual to accommodate ATC/traffic/efficiency/time esp. in the States... "Do you have the field? Report field in sight. Do you have it? How about now?"... If it's not an airport I am very familiar with or a pub
  22. Hi Felix, I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for... but here you go. . For example Capital 4 Arrival, expecting RNP Y 32. I would have loaded the full arrival and placed the expected transition after the vector. Fix sequence like this... VISOL ULAGU DEMKO VOLAG DUKTI VECTORS DEMKO ULDAX XORUX VODUL MIXOT RW32 RAFNO If you clear us the RF transition from DEMKO, I would bring the lower DEMKO up to the top one, and it would clear the points in between, giving me the desired transition... fix sequence lik
  23. Really? Trashing of? Hardly... How many Airbuses are still there? Recent Airbus purchases... 321s, 330s. plus 319s kept. How many Boeings are there? Aside from that, I have no doubt the new sims, training, maintenance, was all part of the package. That's ALL these guys do. Cost sh!t out. They don't care it's this or that or FAs hate it... Why would they? I don't care either... it is what it is... and the passengers like it... big TV screens and big bins...