• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by ILB

  1. Damage from deadhead (tree) can be seen in video I posted above.
  2. Sounds like the hit a deadhead in the water.
  3. Our family renewed last fall when the window for renewal opened. Uneventful, completely comfortably before expiry.
  4. CADORS 2020O0353 The pilot of a Bearskin Airlines Fairchild SA227-DC (C-GJVB/BLS344) from Dryden, ON (CYHD) to Sioux Lookout, ON (CYXL) reported a loss of control during take-off, resulting in the aircraft sustaining damage. One minor injury was reported
  5. I hand-fly to about 14 000 most departures, and find that the FOs that need the practice the least, do the same. To be clear, I do need the practice. Perishable skill and all. Agree not many 738 overruns due braking performance. Landing fast is not ideal but can be managed. Land long, and there's not much hope of staying on the hard surface. Land long, and there's a higher chance other items will be delayed or forgotten, like reverse thrust. Given the sheer number of 738 overruns, you'd think Boeing and the airlines would hasten towards implementing and installing RSAT/ROPS or some version thereof. I don't think it's a matter of changing SOPs, and I'm not optimistic pilot technique will improve, once again a technology might help, like EGPWS and TCAS. Boeing Runways Situation Awareness Tools Airbus Runway Overrun Prevention System
  6. Thanks very much for sharing this, Don. Your link may be broken, is this the document? Report of the Flight Crew Human Factors Investigation for the DSB TK1951
  7. 1. Approach no. 1, hit cloud of locusts, obscured windshield, went around, climbed to 8500, depressurized, opened flight deck window, cleaned window. 2. Approach no. 2, hit cloud of locusts, obscured windshield, went around, climbed to 8500, depressurized, opened flight deck window, cleaned window. 3. Diverted. Details and pics at
  8. Are there any penalties for budgets that fail to balance themselves?
  9. A Phoenix-based Southwest Airlines flight attendant has sued the airline, accusing the Dallas-based carrier of retaliation after she reported spotting two pilots livestreaming video from the lavatory to an iPad in the cockpit on one of her flights. A suit filed in federal court for the District of Arizona alleges that on Feb. 27, 2017, Renee Steinaker was working as a flight attendant on Flight 1088 between Pittsburgh and Phoenix. The suit alleges that 2½ hours into the flight, the pilot, Capt. Terry Graham, asked Steinaker to come to the cockpit so that he could leave to use the restroom. Southwest Airlines policy requires two crew members in the cockpit at all times, so Steinaker was asked to staff the cockpit with co-pilot Ryan Russell in Graham's absence. The suit states that when Steinaker entered the cockpit, she spotted an iPad mounted to the windshield to the left of the captain’s seat. On it, she reportedly could see a live stream of what appeared to be Graham in the bathroom. The filing states that Russell looked panicked and told her the cameras were a new top-secret security measure that had been installed in all Southwest Airlines planes, which Steinaker did not believe to be true. "They led her to believe that she and others had been filmed — had been videotaped if you will — while they were using the lavatory. It's really hard to imagine a more outrageous kind of conduct," aviation attorney Ronald L.M. Goldman, who is representing Steinaker, told the Arizona Republic. Goldman is a senior partner at Baum Hedlund Aristei Goldman, with offices in California, Pennsylvania and Washington, DC. According to the court filing, Steinaker took a photograph of the iPad with her cellphone to document the incident. Upon landing, the pilots violated airline protocol and "disembarked, leaving the aircraft unattended by piloting staff," Steinaker alleges in the suit. It also claims that Graham "left a loaded firearm unattended in the cockpit, a violation of FAA regulations." Steinaker and other crew members reported the incident to the airline. The suit claims the pilots were allowed to proceed to their next flight and they continue to fly with the airline today. Steinaker claims she was told not to talk to anybody about the incident and was warned that "if this got out, if this went public, no one, I mean no one, would ever fly our airline again." Goldman also represents Steinaker's husband, David, also a Southwest flight attendant. The suit alleges the Steinakers have faced retaliation through stalking, being monitored by managers in a "threatening and bizarre manner" and being subjected to an increased number of performance audits. "In my view, Southwest Airlines has treated this as 'how dare they report it' rather than 'thank you for letting us know,'" Goldman said. In an emailed statement to the Arizona Republic, a representative for Southwest Airlines said: "The safety and security of our employees and customers is Southwest’s uncompromising priority. As such, Southwest does not place cameras in the lavatories of our aircraft. At this time, we have no other comment on the pending litigation." We reached out to the attorney representing the two pilots named in the suit by email and phone. We will update this story when we receive a response. In court, attorneys for the pilots have denied that the two engaged in livestreaming the lavatory. Court filings also deny that the two violated any airline policy or protocol. To Goldman, the incident indicates both privacy and safety concerns. "In my opinion as an aviation lawyer with many years of experience, this does compromise the safety of flight and the safety of passengers, not even to mention for the potential of violating the privacy of all of the passengers as well as the crew," Goldman said.
  10. Sometimes forgotten is that while women were enfranchised federally in 1918, for provincial elections Quebec was the last province to grant this right to women in 1940--well before non-status Indians who generally got this right in the early 50s and status Indians around 1960. Men who didn't own property also couldn't vote until around 1920.
  11. From photo by
  12. The issue was with CRT (not LCD) screens and Wi-Fi frequencies (not cell). The screen-blanking effect could be reliably replicated under certain conditions and thus the flight deck ban on Wi-Fi until all CRTs had been replaced with LCDs. The cellular frequencies don't interfere with any of the screen types--although I can hear the interference in my Bose A20 headset when they ring. I can also hear the sweep of the SSR in YWG and YOW.
  13. Great video. In 25 years of flying, I've never experienced severe turbulence, and I hope I never do. I've gone down to 25 to get below SIGMETed areas of forecasted SVR TBC. Sometimes that's not an option.
  14. Curious four other snags on same tail during a span of seven days in December: The report states that maintenance action was performed and no reoccurance of same faults. Maintenance action consisted of BITE checks with no faults founds and thereafter ground-tested serviceable.
  15. Further down:
  16. Which battle is that, specifically? Do you have an interest in a particular outcome?
  17. Sooo...weigh-in at check-in? Is the M/F not primarily for being able to arrive at standard weights?
  18. Now rated by TSB as an accident due hard landing according to AvHerald.
  19. I'm curious about why the rudder pedal travel appears to be different between the MAX and NG. Or is it just me?